We pulled every number in this review from published third-party benchmark reports and our own hardware catalog — see our review methodology.
The NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super delivers 21.75 tok/s on Qwen2.5-7B (INT4) and ~31 tok/s on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B (Q4) for $249, versus the Raspberry Pi 5 8GB at 5.80 tok/s on Llama 3.2 3B (Q4_K_M) for $80. On an any-model-you-want basis the Orin Nano Super is roughly 4–6× faster for LLM inference and ~12× faster for classical vision workloads like YOLOv8 — but the Pi 5 is still the better buy for non-AI edge projects. Here is what the benchmark data actually supports.
Key takeaways
- If you're building an always-on LLM endpoint, the Orin Nano Super is the only device in its price class that runs 7B-class models above conversational speed (>20 tok/s). The Pi 5 tops out around 2 tok/s on Mistral 7B — usable for batch jobs, not chat.
- Under 3B parameters, the gap narrows dramatically. Pi 5 runs Llama 3.2 3B at 5.80 tok/s and BitNet B1.58 2B at 8 tok/s — perfectly serviceable for RAG and classification. Spending 3× more on the Jetson for a 2B model is overkill.
- For non-AI edge work — home automation, media servers, retro gaming, GPIO projects — the Pi 5 is still the answer. Its 10,000-project software ecosystem, broader Linux compatibility, and $80 entry point are untouchable.
- The Jetson's real unlock is the CUDA stack. TensorRT, DeepStream, Isaac ROS, and the cuDNN-accelerated llama.cpp build give you genuine datacenter-class tooling in a 25 W envelope. Pi 5 with the Hailo-8L AI HAT (+$70) is the closest software-compatible competitor, but the toolchain is narrower.
- Neither device replaces a real GPU for model development. Both are inference-optimized. If you're training or fine-tuning, put the budget toward an RTX 4090 or a 5090 and keep these boards for deployment.
Orin Nano Super at a glance: what $249 now buys
The Orin Nano Super isn't new silicon — it's a firmware unlock of the 2023 Orin Nano 8GB. NVIDIA bumped the GPU clock to 1,020 MHz, raised the CPU from 1.5 GHz to 1.7 GHz, and unlocked a 25 W MAXN Super power profile on a module that previously capped at 15 W. The result: 67 TOPS (INT8 sparse) from the same SoC that used to ship as "40 TOPS." Existing Orin Nano Dev Kit owners got the upgrade for free via a JetPack update in December 2024. New buyers get the same module at the lower $249 MSRP.
| Spec | Jetson Orin Nano Super | Raspberry Pi 5 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $80 (board only) / $199 kit |
| CPU | 6× Arm Cortex-A78AE @ 1.7 GHz | 4× Arm Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | 1,024-core Ampere w/ 32 Tensor Cores | VideoCore VII (no AI accel) |
| AI TOPS (INT8) | 67 | 0 (CPU only) |
| RAM | 8 GB LPDDR5-102 GB/s | 8 GB LPDDR4X-17 GB/s |
| Storage | M.2 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 ×4) | microSD + PCIe Gen2 ×1 HAT |
| Power modes | 7 W / 15 W / 25 W (MAXN Super) | ~3 W idle / ~9 W load |
| Wireless | None (M.2 E-key slot) | Wi-Fi 5 + BT 5.0 onboard |
| OS | JetPack 6 (Ubuntu 22.04 + CUDA 12) | Raspberry Pi OS (Debian 12) |
| Release | Dec 2024 ("Super" unlock) | Oct 2023 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | ~4,900 (est., A78AE @1.7) | 1,604 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | ~4,800 (est.) | 2,226 |
Source: NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit spec sheet, Raspberry Pi Foundation benchmarks, our Raspberry Pi 5 8GB benchmark page. Geekbench 6 multi-core for the Raspberry Pi 5 8GB = 1,604 per the Raspberry Pi Foundation's own published numbers.
How does Jetson Orin Nano Super compare to Raspberry Pi 5 in AI workloads?
Across every benchmark we have on file, the Orin Nano Super wins — usually by 4–12×, depending on how well the workload parallelizes on its 1,024 CUDA cores.
LLM token generation (single-user, Q4 class quantization)
| Model (quant) | Orin Nano Super | Raspberry Pi 5 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| TinyLlama 1.1B (Q8_0, llama.cpp) | ~35 tok/s (est.) | 4.77 tok/s | ~7× |
| Phi-2 2.7B (Q4) | ~28 tok/s (est.) | 5.13 tok/s | ~5× |
| Llama 3.2 3B (Q4_K_M) | ~26 tok/s (est.) | 5.80 tok/s | ~4.5× |
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B (Q4) | 30.98 tok/s | N/A on Pi | — |
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B (Q4, Cytron retest) | 24.20 tok/s | N/A | — |
| Mistral 7B (Q4) | ~18 tok/s (est.) | 2.00 tok/s | ~9× |
| Qwen2.5-7B (INT4, MLC) | 21.75 tok/s | N/A | — |
| Llama 2 13B (Q4_0) | ~8 tok/s (est., MAXN) | 1.50 tok/s (Pi 5 16GB) | ~5× |
| BitNet B1.58 2B 4T (1.58-bit) | ~40 tok/s (est.) | 8.00 tok/s | ~5× |
Hard numbers in bold are from our ai_benchmarks catalog. Sources: Cytron's DeepSeek-R1 walkthrough (24.20 tok/s), DEV Community write-up by Ajeet Raina (30.98 tok/s with an optimized Ollama + Docker setup), NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab developer forum thread (21.75 tok/s on Qwen2.5-7B INT4 via MLC), and the aggregated Pi 5 numbers from aidatatools' Pi 5 Ollama benchmarks, Jeff Geerling's 16GB Pi 5 review, and Stratosphere Laboratory's BitNet test. "Est." entries interpolate between published Orin Nano Super numbers using the standard memory-bandwidth-limited scaling model; treat them as ±15 %.
The honest headline: the Orin Nano Super is the only sub-$300 device that clears 20 tok/s on a 7B-class model. That's the threshold where a local assistant feels responsive instead of apologetic.
Classical CV / vision workloads
Vision is where the Jetson's CUDA+TensorRT stack earns its keep. YOLOv8n at 640×640 hits 32–40 FPS on the Orin Nano Super with TensorRT FP16, per NVIDIA's Jetson AI Lab benchmarks. A Raspberry Pi 5 running the same model on CPU manages ~2.7 FPS; even with the Hailo-8L AI HAT+ (Raspberry Pi's own $70 AI accelerator), it reaches ~30 FPS — matching the Jetson, but only for Hailo-supported models.
What this means in practice
- Real-time video analytics on 1–2 streams at 1080p → Orin Nano Super, easily. Pi 5 + Hailo-8L can do it for one stream but chokes on two.
- Local chat assistant (7B model, conversational latency) → Orin Nano Super only.
- Keyword-spotting, small classifiers, 1B-class LLMs for router-style prompt dispatch → Pi 5 is fine.
- Embedded robotics with ROS2 → Orin wins decisively; NVIDIA Isaac ROS has GPU-accelerated perception nodes that the Pi simply cannot run.
Can you actually run Llama 3.1 8B or Qwen2.5-7B on the Orin Nano Super?
Yes, with caveats. The 8 GB unified memory is the gating factor — the module shares RAM between the CPU and GPU, so anything you allocate for the model reduces what's available for OS + CUDA workspace.
Practical working matrix for 8 GB Orin Nano Super (MAXN Super power mode):
| Model | Quant | On-disk size | Runtime RAM | Fits? | Expected tok/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TinyLlama 1.1B | Q8_0 | 1.2 GB | ~2.0 GB | Yes | ~35 |
| Phi-2 2.7B | Q4 | 1.7 GB | ~2.6 GB | Yes | ~28 |
| Llama 3.2 3B | Q4_K_M | 2.0 GB | ~3.0 GB | Yes | ~26 |
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Q4 | 1.1 GB | ~2.0 GB | Yes | 30.98 |
| Qwen2.5-7B | INT4 (MLC) | 4.2 GB | ~5.8 GB | Yes, tight | 21.75 |
| Mistral 7B | Q4_K_M | 4.1 GB | ~5.5 GB | Yes, tight | ~18 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | Q4_K_M | 4.9 GB | ~6.5 GB | Yes, very tight — close everything else | ~15 |
| Llama 2 13B | Q4_0 | 7.4 GB | ~8.5 GB | No (swap-thrash) | — |
| Qwen2.5-14B | Q4_K_M | 8.8 GB | ~10 GB | No | — |
If you need anything larger than 8B at reasonable quant, the Orin NX 16GB ($599) or the AGX Orin 32/64GB is the correct upgrade path — not the Nano Super with swap.
Runtime recommendations for the Orin Nano Super
- MLC-LLM: consistently the fastest runtime on Jetson for 7B-class models in 2026. The Qwen2.5-7B at 21.75 tok/s number above was MLC. Setup is more work than Ollama — you compile the model against the Orin's specific TVM target.
- Ollama via NVIDIA's Ollama container (DEV Community walkthrough): easiest path, within ~10 % of MLC on small models. The Docker image NVIDIA ships handles CUDA automatically.
- llama.cpp with CUDA: middle ground. Best if you want to experiment with custom quants or grammar-constrained decoding. Use the Jetson-specific CUDA backend build (GGML_CUDA=1).
- vLLM: works on Jetson in 2026 but you lose the memory-efficiency advantage on an 8 GB board — vLLM's PagedAttention shines at batch > 1. For single-user use MLC or Ollama.
What does Raspberry Pi 5 actually do best?
The Pi 5 is not an AI board, and treating it like one sets you up to overpay and under-perform. Where it dominates:
- Home automation hubs (Home Assistant OS, ESPHome, Zigbee2MQTT) — 90 % of the installed base.
- NAS / media server builds with the PCIe Gen2 ×1 slot and an NVMe HAT. Cheapest path to a silent 2 TB home NAS.
- Retro gaming handhelds and arcade cabinets (RetroPie, Batocera, EmulationStation).
- GPIO + sensor + I²C projects — 40-pin header, well-documented hats, massive hobby community.
- Classrooms and certifications — the Raspberry Pi curriculum is the default in schools.
- Kubernetes / Docker clusters for fun — see our 8-node Pi cluster guide.
Even on AI, the Pi 5 is surprisingly capable for small models. At Q4 quantization, Llama 3.2 3B runs at 5.80 tok/s — faster than most people type. If your use case is an offline classifier, a 1-2 request-per-minute RAG endpoint, or a sub-agent on a mesh, the Pi 5 is good enough and a third the price.
Where the Pi 5 falls over for AI
- Anything ≥ 7B parameters: 2 tok/s is technically working, practically not. You're looking at 30+ seconds for a short paragraph.
- Vision at >5 FPS without Hailo-8L: VideoCore VII has no ML acceleration. Plain-CPU YOLO on the Pi 5 is a demo, not a deployment.
- Any workload that requires CUDA — PyTorch/TF with CUDA, Whisper-Turbo, most diffusion pipelines, TensorRT. These simply don't exist on Pi.
- Concurrency: with 4 cores at ~1,600 Geekbench 6 multi, the Pi 5 is single-tenant in practice.
Power, thermals, and real-world cost
Orin Nano Super sustained draw:
- 7 W mode: ~9 W at wall with typical PSU losses, throttled to ~12 TOPS.
- 15 W mode (default): 17–18 W wall, ~40 TOPS sustained.
- 25 W MAXN Super: 28–30 W wall, the full 67 TOPS — but ships with a recommended 5A USB-C PD supply and the included active cooler is mandatory. Without adequate airflow the SoC hits 94 °C and throttles back to 15 W within ~3 minutes.
Raspberry Pi 5 sustained:
- Idle: 3 W.
- 100 % CPU load with active cooler: 8–9 W.
- With Hailo-8L AI HAT+ under AI load: ~12–13 W.
Cost-per-token-per-second (Qwen2.5-7B class workload):
- Orin Nano Super @ 21.75 tok/s / $249 = $11.45 per tok/s.
- Pi 5 8 GB + Hailo-8L (no 7B LLM path) = not comparable; Hailo runs compiled-graph vision models, not GGUF LLMs.
- Pi 5 @ 2 tok/s on Mistral 7B / $80 = $40 per tok/s (and still unusable for chat).
The Orin wins per-dollar-per-token for LLM work by a factor of roughly 3.5×. For anything where tokens don't matter, the Pi's $80 entry fee is unmatched.
Buying the hardware (what we actually recommend)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit — $249
The official SKU. 347 verified Amazon reviews, 4.2 stars. Includes the carrier board, Orin Nano 8 GB module, and the reference active cooler. You still need to add a microSD (16 GB+ for boot), an NVMe SSD (256 GB+ recommended — JetPack 6 is large), and a 5 V / 5 A USB-C PD supply if you plan to run MAXN Super. Expect to spend ~$80 more to get the full rig on its feet.
View on Amazon →Prices quoted in this article were checked Apr 24, 2026; check the listing for the current price and availability.
See our full Jetson Orin Nano Super benchmark page →
Raspberry Pi 5 8GB — $80 (bare board) / ~$200 kit
The board itself is $80 MSRP but almost never ships in isolation — CanaKit, Vilros, and the official Pi Imager kit bundles are the norm for most buyers. The Raspberry Pi 5 8GB Amazon SKU currently sits at 4.7 stars across 2,750+ reviews.
View on Amazon →Prices quoted in this article were checked Apr 24, 2026. Current Amazon price: $192.99 (checked 2026-10-21); price and availability change.
See our full Raspberry Pi 5 review →
Add the Hailo-8L AI HAT+ if you want AI on the Pi
If you're already in the Pi ecosystem and need meaningful AI performance, the $70 Hailo-8L accelerator HAT pushes the Pi 5 to 13 TOPS and matches the Jetson for classic CV workloads. It will not run GGUF LLMs — it's a fixed-function NN accelerator programmed via Hailo's DFC toolchain. Think YOLO, pose estimation, semantic segmentation — not Llama.
Common deployment failure modes (and how to fix them)
- Orin Nano Super throttling under 3 minutes of MAXN Super load. The reference cooler is just enough at 25 °C ambient. Above that, switch to an active Waveshare/Yahboom metal case with an extra 40 mm fan — it holds the SoC at 72 °C indefinitely.
- CUDA OOM on Qwen/Llama 7B INT4. You forgot to stop GNOME. Switch to a minimal-image multi-user target or flash the Jetson minimal image without desktop — frees ~1.2 GB.
- Ollama on Jetson reporting "no GPU" during inference. Use NVIDIA's dedicated Jetson-Ollama container, not the generic x86 image. The native Ollama installer script does not detect Jetson's Tegra GPU correctly.
- Raspberry Pi 5 llama.cpp running at ~1 tok/s instead of the expected 5. You're using an older llama.cpp build without NEON optimizations or you're running on swap. Confirm the model fits in RAM before you load it.
- Pi 5 "undervoltage detected" warning during AI load. The Pi 5 genuinely needs the 5 V / 5 A USB-C PSU (not 3 A). This is not optional with the Hailo-8L HAT attached.
Decision matrix: which one should you actually buy?
| Get the Jetson Orin Nano Super if… | Get the Raspberry Pi 5 if… |
|---|---|
| You need >20 tok/s on a 7B LLM locally | You're already fluent in Pi and have projects in-flight |
| You're building CUDA/TensorRT pipelines | Your workload is home automation, NAS, or GPIO |
| You're deploying ROS2 robotics with vision | AI is ≤ 3B parameters OR not the primary use case |
| Power budget is up to 25 W | You need onboard Wi-Fi/Bluetooth without adding a card |
| You'll commit to the NVIDIA JetPack ecosystem | You want the cheapest viable entry (< $100) |
| Single-user AI inference is the primary use case | Fleet / cluster deployments where total cost scales |
Get neither if you're training models (buy a real discrete GPU — see our Best GPU for local AI in 2026 guide), or if you need >20 FPS multi-stream video analytics (step up to the Jetson Orin NX 16GB or AGX Orin).
Bottom line
The Orin Nano Super is the first NVIDIA dev kit where the price-to-performance math is genuinely reasonable for hobbyists and small-deployment commercial work. At $249 it's the cheapest way to get CUDA 12, TensorRT, and 20+ tok/s on a 7B LLM — and that combination doesn't exist anywhere else in this bracket. The Raspberry Pi 5 remains the right answer for everything that isn't specifically AI-bound, and a surprisingly capable inference device once you accept the ≤3B parameter ceiling. Most serious edge-AI builders will end up owning both within a year: Pi 5 for I/O and always-on services, Orin for the model-serving layer.
Sources
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit — official product page and spec sheet — MSRP, TOPS, power modes, module specs.
- Cytron: DeepSeek-R1 on the Jetson Orin Nano Super — 24.20 tok/s Q4 benchmark, reproducible setup.
- DEV Community (Ajeet Raina): DeepSeek-R1 + Docker + Ollama on Jetson — 30.98 tok/s optimized result.
- NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab developer forums — Qwen2.5-7B MLC benchmark thread — 21.75 tok/s on INT4.
- Jeff Geerling: Who would buy a Raspberry Pi 5 16GB? — Llama 2 13B at 1.50 tok/s and general Pi 5 LLM analysis.
- Stratosphere Laboratory: How well do LLMs perform on a Raspberry Pi 5? — BitNet B1.58 2B at 8 tok/s.
- Raspberry Pi Foundation: Official Pi 5 benchmarks — Geekbench 6 and CPU performance baselines.
Related guides
- Local AI on Raspberry Pi 5: Real Benchmarks for Llama, Phi, and Gemma
- Raspberry Pi 5 8GB Review (2026): Still the SBC to Beat
- Orange Pi 5 Plus vs Raspberry Pi 5: The Honest Head-to-Head
- Best Raspberry Pi Alternatives for SBC Enthusiasts in 2026
- Build an 8-Node Raspberry Pi Cluster for Distributed Computing
— SpecPicks Editorial
