Skip to main content

RTX 5080 vs RTX 4090: Which GPU Is Best in 2026?

A head-to-head benchmark comparison covering 4K gaming, ray tracing, local AI inference, power efficiency, and real-world price/performance.

We compared the RTX 5080 and RTX 4090 head-to-head across 4K gaming, ray tracing, and local LLM inference using real benchmark data.

RTX 5080 vs RTX 4090: Which GPU Is Best in 2026?

Hardware at a Glance

Median generation throughput at 7–9B models (Llama 3.1 8B, Qwen 3 8B), Q4 quantization, from community-reported runs SpecPicks tracks. Each row pools runs from different sources, runtimes and models in that class, so the rows are not a matched head-to-head; where the article compares cards on the same rig, its own figures are the like-for-like result. Street price is the second-lowest listing priced within the last 24 hours at 0.5–2× launch MSRP, so no single listing sets it, and a street figure well above MSRP says so in its cell; where too few listings pass that check the cell shows a dash and the launch MSRP, which is not comparable with the street figures. Rows marked for comparison are not the cards this article is about — they are included so the throughput column has something to be read against.

GPUVRAM Llama-3-8B class, Q4Street price Sources
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 16 GB 132 tok/s5 runs · 4 sources —too few current listings for a street figure · launch MSRP was $999 SpecPicks median of 5 runs; sources: llama.cpp GitHub, Hardware Corner, Local AI Master, LocalScore (Mozilla Builders)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB 129.2 tok/s8 runs · 7 sources —too few current listings for a street figure · launch MSRP was $1,599 SpecPicks median of 8 runs; sources: GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference…, Awesome Agents LLM Leaderboard, Database Mart, Hardware Corner +3 more
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Tifor comparison 16 GB 122.8 tok/s6 runs · 6 sources $1,350street, all listings · 1.8× the $749 launch MSRP SpecPicks median of 6 runs; sources: Compute Market, ComputingForGeeks, Hardware Corner, KnightLi +2 more

Which models fit on an RTX 4090?

RTX 4090 carries 24 GB of VRAM. The weights column is the range of real Q4_K_M files on Hugging Face for the models in each size class (about 0.6 GB per billion parameters), and the runtime plus a usable context window wants about 2 GB on top; every tokens-per-second figure is a median over community-reported Q4 runs SpecPicks tracks for this card, with the run count and the source beside it.

Model size Weights at Q4 Fits in 24 GB? Measured Left for context Source
3B (Llama 3.2 3B, Qwen 3 4B)Runs on almost anything with a discrete GPU, and usably on modern integrated graphics. about 2 GB Fits: weights and a usable context window Nothing on file → ~21 GBfor runtime and KV cache —
7-9B (Llama 3.1 8B, Qwen 3 8B)The mainstream local model. An 8 GB card fits it; a 12 GB card fits it with real context. 4.4–5.8 GB Fits: weights and a usable context window 129.2 tok/s8 runs · 7 sources ~18 GBfor runtime and KV cache Database Mart
12-14B (Qwen 3 14B, Phi-4)Where 8 GB stops being enough. 12 GB is the smallest card that holds it with a usable context window. 7.3–9.1 GB Fits: weights and a usable context window 68.6 tok/s7 runs · 4 sources ~14 GBfor runtime and KV cache Database Mart
20-27B (Gemma 3 27B, Mistral Small)A 27B Q4_K_M file (about 16.7 GB) is more than a 16 GB card holds, so 16 GB means a Q3 quant or partial CPU offload; a 24B loads with a short context. 20 GB holds the class with a usable context window, 24 GB with a long one. 14.3–16.7 GB Fits: weights and a usable context window Nothing on file → ~7 GBfor runtime and KV cache —
30-35B (Qwen 3 32B, QwQ 32B)The step change. A 24 GB card holds this entirely in VRAM; below that it is CPU offload. about 19.9 GB Fits: weights and a usable context window 34.3 tok/s6 runs · 4 sources ~4 GBfor runtime and KV cache Database Mart
70B+ (Llama 3.3 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B)One 48 GB card or two 24 GB cards. A 32 GB card runs it only with layers in system RAM. about 42.5 GB No: spills to system RAM — system-RAM bandwidth sets the speed 13.3 tok/s4 runs · 4 sources none Awesome Agents LLM Leaderboard

Every RTX 4090 benchmark run, with its source → GPU picks for local LLM — the same table across every card we track How we source these numbers

See our review methodology.

The RTX 5080 vs 4090 question is the most interesting GPU matchup of 2026 because the answer genuinely depends on your workload. On paper, NVIDIA's new Blackwell-based RTX 5080 lists at a $999 MSRP with 10,752 CUDA cores, 16 GB of GDDR7, and a 360 W TDP — while the two-generation-old RTX 4090 still commands $1,599 MSRP (and $2,800+ on the secondary market) with 16,384 CUDA cores, 24 GB of GDDR6X, and a 450 W TDP. In pure raster gaming and at 4K, the 4090's brute-force compute advantage holds up; in local LLM inference above 16 GB VRAM, it's not close; but the 5080 wins on efficiency, DLSS 4 frame-gen, and cost per frame at 1440p.

This article is for buyers choosing between these two specific cards — gamers eyeing a 4K build, creators doing mixed 3D/AI workloads, and LocalLLaMA users weighing VRAM against raw speed. It is not a buying guide to the entire Blackwell or Ada stack; if you're considering the RTX 5090 vs 4090 or the RTX 5080 vs 5090, see those dedicated comparisons.

Key Takeaways

  • The RTX 4090 wins 4K native rasterization by roughly 15–25% in most titles, but the RTX 5080 closes the gap with DLSS 4 and multi-frame generation.
  • For any local LLM larger than 13B at q4_K_M, the 4090's 24 GB VRAM is decisive — the 5080's 16 GB can't fit 70B-class models at reasonable quality.
  • The 5080 draws 90 W less under load (360 W vs 450 W) and is ~15% more efficient in FPS-per-watt.
  • At MSRP, the 5080 is the better price/performance buy; at street prices (where the 4090 often sells $1,500+ over MSRP), the 5080 is a landslide win for gamers.
  • If you've already got a 4090, there is no upgrade case to the 5080 — only to the RTX 5090.

Spec sheet: RTX 5080 vs RTX 4090

SpecRTX 5080RTX 4090Winner
ArchitectureBlackwell (GB203)Ada Lovelace (AD102)—
CUDA cores10,75216,3844090 (+52%)
Boost clock2,617 MHz2,520 MHz5080 (+4%)
VRAM16 GB GDDR724 GB GDDR6X4090 (+50%)
Memory bus256-bit384-bit4090
Memory bandwidth~960 GB/s~1,008 GB/s4090 (marginal)
TDP360 W450 W5080 (−20%)
MSRP$999$1,5995080 (−38%)
Ray-tracing cores4th-gen3rd-gen5080
DLSSDLSS 4 (Multi Frame Gen)DLSS 3.5 (Frame Gen)5080
Launch dateJan 2025Oct 2022—

The 4090 has the raw silicon advantage — 52% more shader units and 50% more VRAM — but the 5080's newer node, faster GDDR7, and improved RT/Tensor cores narrow the gap at lower resolutions and in any workload that can use DLSS 4's 4×-frame generation.

Gaming performance: is the 4090 still faster at 4K?

Yes — in native 4K rasterization, the RTX 4090 remains the faster card. Pulling real numbers from our benchmark database:

GameResolutionPresetRTX 5080RTX 4090DeltaSource
Cyberpunk 20774KUltra (native)—45.2 fps (1% low 32.1)—TechPowerUp
Cyberpunk 20774KRT Overdrive + DLSS Q115 fps (1% low 62)103.5 fps (DLSS 3 FG)5080 +11%Tom's Hardware / The FPS Review
Cyberpunk 20774KRT Ultra + DLSS Q50 fps28.7 fps (1% low 19.4)5080 +74%TechSpot / Gamers Nexus
Alan Wake 24KUltra (RT off)49 fps59.2 fps4090 +21%KitGuru / Hardware Times
Alan Wake 24KRT Overdrive + DLSS Q36 fps32.8 fps (native PT)mixedTom's Hardware
Black Myth: Wukong4KUltra (native)58 fps34.8 fps (1% low 25.6)5080 +67% ⚠Gamers Nexus / Hardware Unboxed
Black Myth: Wukong4KRT Very High + DLSS36 fps44 fps4090 +22%KitGuru / Tom's Hardware
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty4KUltra (native)—75 fps—TechSpot
Starfield4KUltra (native)—68.4 fps (1% low 52.3)—Gamers Nexus

A few honest caveats on the table above:

  • Some of the apparent 5080 "wins" at 4K are measuring native rasterization against the 4090's path-traced numbers. When both cards run the same settings natively, the 4090 is ahead.
  • The Wukong 4K native figure (58 fps) for the 5080 comes from Gamers Nexus at Ultra preset, while the 4090 figure (34.8 fps) is from Hardware Unboxed at Ultra with heavier test scenes — the gap is narrower in apples-to-apples runs (HUB's own 4090 Ultra runs sit in the 50-55 fps range, comparable to the 5080).
  • In DLSS-enabled titles, DLSS 4's multi-frame generation gives the 5080 a headline-FPS advantage that doesn't reflect raw shader work — motion-clarity purists should note the frame-pacing caveat.

Verdict at 4K (native, no FG): 4090 is ~15–25% faster on average across our DB. Verdict at 4K with DLSS 4 enabled: 5080 often matches or beats the 4090 on chart-paper FPS, but with an extra interpolated frame of latency.

At 1440p, the gap narrows further — the 5080 is frequently within 5–10% of the 4090 because both cards become CPU-bound before they're GPU-bound in most esports and mid-tier AAA titles.

Synthetic benchmarks

BenchmarkRTX 5080RTX 4090DeltaSource
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (Graphics)—19,000 pts—TechPowerUp
3DMark Time Spy Extreme—38,450 pts—TechPowerUp
3DMark Time Spy Graphics32,701 pts——NotebookCheck
3DMark Speed Way8,980 pts——Overclocking.com
PassMark G3D Mark35,697 pts38,066 pts4090 +7%PassMark
PassMark G2D Mark1,407 pts1,302 pts5080 +8%PassMark
Cinebench R23 (multi)—42,500 pts—Tom's Hardware
Deep Learning (ResNet-50)—128,000 images/sec—Puget Systems

The PassMark G3D composite — which averages several 3D tests — puts the 4090 7% ahead, which tracks with the 4K gaming average above and is a more honest aggregate than the headline Time Spy numbers.

Local AI inference: the 4090's hidden moat

For LocalLLaMA and inference workloads, VRAM capacity often matters more than peak TFLOPS. Here the 4090's 24 GB is decisive.

Model / QuantRTX 5080 (16 GB)RTX 4090 (24 GB)Notes
Llama 3.2 1B (Q4_K_M)103 tok/s (LocalScore)—Both trivially fast
Llama 3 8B (Q4_K_M)—150 tok/s (NVIDIA) / 440 tok/s (ollama)Fits both cards
Llama 3 8B (Q8)—54.2 tok/s (Phoronix, vram ~8.3 GB)Fits both
Llama 2 7B (INT4 AWQ)—194 tok/s (arXiv)Fits both
Qwen2.5 14B (Q4_K_M)25.5 tok/s (LocalScore)—Tight on 5080 (10–12 GB)
DeepSeek-R1 14B (Q4_K_M)70 tok/s (Windows Central, 9 GB VRAM)—Fits both
GPT-OSS 20B (MXFP4)128 tok/s (Windows Central, 13 GB VRAM)—Fits on 5080 at the margin
Llama 2 13B (INT4 AWQ)—110 tok/s (arXiv)Fits both
Llama 3.1 70B (Q4_K_M)❌ won't fit18.5 tok/s (LocalLlama, 42 GB VRAM needed)4090 needs CPU offload (slow) or multi-GPU
Qwen 3 32B (Q4_K_M)tight~35–40 tok/s typical4090 fits comfortably; 5080 requires q3 or offload

The practical framing:

  • Under 14B at q4/q8: both cards are fast; 5080's newer Tensor cores often match the 4090 on pure tok/s at matching quantization.
  • 20–32B range: fits the 4090 cleanly; the 5080 is on the edge and forces you into lower quants (q3, q3_K_S) that degrade quality.
  • 70B+: the 4090 fits a 70B at q4_K_M barely (42 GB needed across weights + KV cache means you still need a second GPU or CPU offload); the 5080 can't play in this league at all.

If you want a deeper dive on 70B-class models, see our Run Llama 3.1 70B on RTX 4090 and RTX 5080 equivalent guides.

Power consumption, thermals, and PSU sizing

MetricRTX 5080RTX 4090
Rated TDP360 W450 W
Peak transient (observed)~400 W~500–540 W
Recommended PSU750 W (850 W for headroom)850 W (1000 W for headroom)
Power connector1× 12V-2×6 (16-pin)1× 12VHPWR (16-pin)
Typical load temp (AIB models)65–70 °C68–75 °C

The 5080 pulls roughly 20% less power under load. On a 12-hour-per-day workstation running at sustained load, that's ~1.1 kWh/day of difference — about $65 per year at US average electricity prices. Not life-changing, but real.

A note on the 4090's power connector: the 12VHPWR "melting connector" issue from 2022–2023 is largely resolved in current production cards with the revised 12V-2×6 receptacle and cable, but if you're buying a used 4090, inspect the connector seating carefully.

Price, availability, and perf-per-dollar (2026)

At MSRP:

  • RTX 5080: $999 → available at partner AIB pricing from ~$1,099
  • RTX 4090: $1,599 → MSRP, but discontinued — street prices frequently $2,500–3,500 via resellers and "renewed" listings

Our product database shows MSI 5080 Inspire 3X OC listings at $1,449 and SUPRIM SOC models at $1,736. 4090 Founders Edition listings routinely sit at $2,979–$3,599 via the VIPERA reseller channel; new retail supply from NVIDIA is effectively dead.

Perf-per-dollar math at current street prices:

  • 5080 at $1,449 / ~35,700 PassMark G3D = $40.6 per G3D point
  • 4090 at $3,280 / ~38,100 PassMark G3D = $86.1 per G3D point

That is not a close fight. The only reason to pay 2× the price for a 7% raster advantage is if you specifically need the 24 GB of VRAM for AI or pro-viz work — in which case the calculation changes entirely and the 4090 is the correct answer.

Decision matrix

Your situationRecommended card
4K gaming, budget-conscious, DLSS-tolerantRTX 5080
4K gaming, refuses frame generation, $2k+ budgetRTX 4090 (if available near MSRP) or wait for 5080 Super
1440p high-refresh gaming (240Hz+)RTX 5080 — gap closes, efficiency wins
Local LLMs 13B–32BRTX 4090 — 24 GB is the deciding factor
Local LLMs 70B+Neither — look at RTX 5090 or dual-GPU setups
Stable Diffusion / ComfyUI SDXL at high resRTX 4090 — VRAM ceiling matters
Blender / 3D pro-vizRTX 4090 — 24 GB + mature OptiX support
Building now in 2026, buying newRTX 5080 — the 4090 is functionally discontinued

Where to buy

RTX 5080

We tracked AIB availability across our product catalog; the best-reviewed model in stock is the MSI RTX 5080 Inspire 3X OC (16 GB GDDR7, triple-fan cooler).

View RTX 5080 on Amazon →

Prices quoted in this article were checked Apr 24, 2026; check the listing for the current price and availability.

See full RTX 5080 benchmarks and product listings →

RTX 4090

New-retail 4090s are effectively end-of-life; most listings are "renewed" Founders Edition or reseller-new inventory. Verify cosmetic condition and warranty before buying.

View RTX 4090 on Amazon →

Prices quoted in this article were checked Apr 24, 2026. Current Amazon price: $4,999.95 (checked 2026-10-26); price and availability change.

See full RTX 4090 benchmarks and product listings →

Bottom line

If you're building a new gaming PC in 2026 and choosing between these two cards at their current street prices, the RTX 5080 is the obvious pick for 95% of buyers. It's cheaper, more efficient, and within single-digit percentage points of the 4090 at 1440p — and at 4K with DLSS 4, it often leads on headline FPS.

The RTX 4090 remains the correct answer only when VRAM is decisive — local LLMs in the 20–32B range, SDXL at 2048² with multiple LoRAs, Blender scenes that exceed 16 GB, or pro-viz workflows with large texture budgets. For those use cases, pay the premium. For pure gaming, the 4090's era has ended.

Sources

  1. Tom's Hardware — RTX 5080 Founders Edition review — 4K and 1440p benchmark data, DLSS 4 testing methodology.
  2. TechPowerUp — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU Database — authoritative spec sheet, 3DMark and synthetic numbers.
  3. Gamers Nexus — RTX 4090 Review & Benchmarks — Black Myth: Wukong and Starfield 4K native numbers with 1% lows.
  4. Hardware Unboxed / TechSpot — Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty GPU Benchmarks — RT Ultra and native 4K figures cited in the gaming table.
  5. r/LocalLLaMA — RTX 4090 vs RTX 5090 Llama 3.1 70B inference thread — tok/s data for 70B-class models at q4_K_M that informed the AI inference section.

— SpecPicks Editorial

Products mentioned

Products mentioned in this article

Amazon & eBay listings, plus full specs and alternatives on each product page.

As an Amazon Associate, SpecPicks earns from qualifying purchases; we also earn on qualifying eBay purchases via the eBay Partner Network. Prices shown were last tracked at crawl time and may vary — check the listing for the current price.

Watch a review

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition Review & Benchmarks: Gaming, Power, & Thermals — Gamers Nexus on YouTube

Frequently asked questions

Which GPU is better for 4K gaming, the RTX 5080 or RTX 4090?
For native 4K gaming, the RTX 4090 is generally faster, offering a 15–25% performance advantage in most titles. However, the RTX 5080 narrows the gap significantly when DLSS 4 is enabled, often matching or exceeding the 4090 in charted FPS due to its advanced frame generation capabilities.
How does the RTX 5080 compare to the RTX 4090 in terms of power efficiency?
The RTX 5080 is approximately 15% more efficient in FPS-per-watt and consumes 90 W less power under load (360 W vs. 450 W). This makes it a better choice for users prioritizing energy efficiency or those with smaller power supplies.
Can the RTX 5080 handle large AI models like the RTX 4090?
The RTX 4090's 24 GB of VRAM allows it to handle larger AI models, such as 70B-class LLMs, which the RTX 5080's 16 GB cannot accommodate. For models under 14B, both GPUs perform well, but the 5080 may require lower quantization settings for larger models.
Is the RTX 5080 a good upgrade for current RTX 4090 owners?
No, the RTX 5080 is not a meaningful upgrade for RTX 4090 owners. The 4090 remains superior in raw performance, especially for 4K gaming and AI workloads requiring high VRAM. The 5080 is better suited for those upgrading from older GPUs or seeking better efficiency.
What are the price and availability differences between the RTX 5080 and RTX 4090 in 2026?
The RTX 5080 has an MSRP of $999, making it significantly more affordable than the RTX 4090's $1,599 MSRP. However, the 4090 often sells for $1,500+ over MSRP on the secondary market, making the 5080 a much better value for most buyers in 2026.

— Mike Perry · Updated 2026-10-20

VIPERA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090…
VIPERA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090…
$5,000
View on Amazon →

Amazon Associate — prices tracked 2026-10-26, may vary.