Skip to main content

Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 23% to 143%, including 143% in 3DMark Time Spy (21,296 vs 8,747). On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 7900 GRE generates 116.1 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #10879) against 80.6 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #10879), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Radeon RX 7900 GRE and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecRadeon RX 7900 GRENVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
vram gb 1612
vram type —GDDR6
tdp w —170
cuda cores —3584

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from Tom's Hardware, 3DMark, LANOC, WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, Overclocking.com, TopCPU.net, CpuTronic, HWBOT, TechPowerUp, PCGamesN and PassMark; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkRadeon RX 7900 GRENVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: Tom's Hardware, 3DMark, LANOC
51,358 pts21,653 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, Overclocking.com, 3DMark
12,041 points5,074 points
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better)
Source: TopCPU.net, 3DMark, Overclocking.com, LANOC
4,013 points2,170 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, CpuTronic
4,802 points1,984 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (Vulkan) (higher is better)
Source: HWBOT
5,394 points—
3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 Graphics Score (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark
—1,978 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: TechPowerUp, TopCPU.net, Overclocking.com, LANOC, 3DMark
21,296 pts8,747 points
3DMark Time Spy (overall score) (higher is better)
Source: Legit Reviews
—9,755 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Overclocking.com, PCGamesN
10,249 points—
PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark
1,208 pts984 pts
PassMark G3D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark
27,385 pts16,969 pts
Tom's Hardware GPU Hierarchy (lower is better)
Source: Tom's Hardware
670 rank12 rank

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

All Radeon RX 7900 GRE AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

All NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Radeon RX 7900 GRE or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060?

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 23% to 143%, including 143% in 3DMark Time Spy (21,296 vs 8,747).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 7900 GRE generates 116.1 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #10879) against 80.6 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #10879), best community run on file for each.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →