Skip to main content

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 27% to 52%, including 39% in 3DMark Time Spy (8,747 vs 6,314). On llama3.1:8b, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 generates 64.5 tokens/s (per tyolab.com) against 16.7 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (per Databasemart), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060. Released 2019 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti), 2021 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060). MSRP range: $279 · $329. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
vram gb 612
vram type GDDR6GDDR6
tdp w 120170
cuda cores 15363584

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from Notebookcheck, 3DMark, Modders Inc, WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, TopCPU.net, CpuTronic, PCGamesN, PassMark and Tom's Hardware; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck, 3DMark		 14,413 points21,653 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc		 3,368 points—
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, 3DMark		 —5,074 points
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better)
Source: TopCPU.net, 3DMark		 —2,170 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, CpuTronic		 1,306 points1,984 points
3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 Graphics Score (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark		 —1,978 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: TopCPU.net, Legit Reviews, PCGamesN, Notebookcheck, 3DMark		 6,314 points8,747 points
3DMark Time Spy (overall score) (higher is better)
Source: Legit Reviews		 —9,755 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc		 2,878 points—
PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark		 776 pts984 pts
PassMark G3D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark		 12,615 pts16,969 pts
Tom's Hardware GPU Hierarchy (lower is better)
Source: Tom's Hardware		 —12 rank

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

All NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060?

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 27% to 52%, including 39% in 3DMark Time Spy (8,747 vs 6,314).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama3.1:8b, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 generates 64.5 tokens/s (per tyolab.com) against 16.7 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (per Databasemart), best community run on file for each.

What did the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 cost at launch?

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at a $279 MSRP and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 at $329. Street prices drift from launch pricing; the Where to buy section links current listings.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →