Skip to main content

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 9% to 41%, including 41% in 3DMark Time Spy (12,297 vs 8,747). On qwen2.5:14b, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 generates 26.4 tokens/s (per LocalScore.ai) against 24.7 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (per LocalScore.ai), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vram gb 1220
vram type GDDR6—
tdp w 170—
cuda cores 3584—

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Jisaku Hibi, WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, TopCPU.net, UL Benchmarks, CpuTronic and technical.city; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, Jisaku Hibi		 21,653 points28,799 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Jisaku Hibi		 —13,376 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (higher is better)
Source: Jisaku Hibi		 —6,358 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: WCCFTech, Legit Reviews, 3DMark, Jisaku Hibi		 5,074 points6,420 points
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better)
Source: TopCPU.net, 3DMark		 2,170 points—
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: UL Benchmarks, CpuTronic		 1,984 points2,206 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12 Graphics Score) (higher is better)
Source: UL Benchmarks		 —2,206 points
3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 Graphics Score (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark		 1,978 points—
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: TopCPU.net, 3DMark, Jisaku Hibi		 8,747 points12,297 points
3DMark Time Spy (overall score) (higher is better)
Source: Legit Reviews		 9,755 points—
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Jisaku Hibi		 —4,882 points
Geekbench 5 OpenCL (higher is better)
Source: technical.city		 —124,926 points

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

All NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 AI benchmarks →

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

All RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 or the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 9% to 41%, including 41% in 3DMark Time Spy (12,297 vs 8,747).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On qwen2.5:14b, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 generates 26.4 tokens/s (per LocalScore.ai) against 24.7 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (per LocalScore.ai), best community run on file for each.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →