Can the Instinct MI210 64GB Run Llama 3.1 8B?
Runs
Yes. Llama 3.1 8B at Q4_K_M is a 4.9 GB download (Hugging Face file listing for bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF), and the Instinct MI210 64GB has 64 GB of VRAM, leaving about 59.1 GB for the KV cache and runtime. No published speed measurement for this pair passes SpecPicks' sanity checks yet, so no tokens-per-second figure is quoted.
Buy the Instinct MI210 64GB
No Amazon listing for this card is tracked today — see live eBay listings.
Published runs for Llama 3.1 8B on the Instinct MI210 64GB
No published run for this pair has passed the checks yet. 1 row was rejected (see how the checks work below).
More about this pair
How much VRAM does Llama 3.1 8B need?
The Q4_K_M file is 4.9 GB. Add roughly 1.5 GB for the runtime and an ~8K-token context, so about 6.4 GB of VRAM holds it comfortably. Longer contexts grow the KV cache and need more.
What speed does Llama 3.1 8B reach on the Instinct MI210 64GB?
No published run of Llama 3.1 8B on the Instinct MI210 64GB has been cited yet. Generation reads every weight once per token, so the Instinct MI210 64GB's 1638 GB/s of memory bandwidth divided by the 4.92 GB file puts the theoretical ceiling near 333 tokens per second. That is an upper bound, not a speed estimate: kernel, launch and compute overhead keep real runs below it.
Check another pair
See the full matrix → · All Instinct MI210 64GB benchmarks →
Llama 3.1 8B on other GPUs
- RTX 4060 — Runs, 40 tok/s median
- RTX 3060 Ti — Runs, 57.3 tok/s (1 run)
- RTX 3060 12GB — Runs, 52.2 tok/s median
- Intel Arc B580 — Runs, 40 tok/s median
- RTX 4070 SUPER — Runs, 53.4 tok/s median
- RTX 4060 Ti 16GB — Runs, 49.2 tok/s median
- RTX 5060 Ti 16GB — Runs, 65.1 tok/s median
- Intel Arc A770 16GB — Runs, 38.7 tok/s (1 run)
- Radeon RX 9070 XT — Runs
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER — Runs, 53.9 tok/s (1 run)
- RTX 4080 — Runs, 101 tok/s median
- RTX 5070 Ti — Runs, 95.3 tok/s median
- RTX 5080 — Runs, 88.5 tok/s median
- Tesla P40 24GB — Runs, 50.6 tok/s median
- RTX 3090 — Runs, 92 tok/s median
- Radeon RX 7900 XTX — Runs, 48.3 tok/s median
- RTX 4090 — Runs, 126 tok/s median
- RTX 5090 — Runs, 150 tok/s (1 run)
- RTX A6000 48GB — Runs
- RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48GB — Runs, 150 tok/s median
- RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB — Runs, 138 tok/s (1 run)
Other models on the Instinct MI210 64GB
- Llama 3.2 1B — Runs
- Llama 3.2 3B — Runs
- Mistral 7B — Runs
- Qwen2.5 7B — Runs
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 8B — Runs
- Qwen3 8B — Runs
- Gemma 2 9B — Runs
- Gemma 3 12B — Runs
- Qwen2.5 14B — Runs
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen 14B — Runs
- Qwen3 14B — Runs
- Phi-4 14B — Runs
- gpt-oss-20b — Runs
- Gemma 3 27B — Runs
- Gemma 2 27B — Runs
- Qwen3 30B-A3B — Runs
- Qwen3 32B — Runs
- Qwen2.5 32B — Runs
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen 32B — Runs
- Qwen3 32B (Q6_K) — Runs
- Qwen2.5 32B (Q6_K) — Runs
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen 32B (Q6_K) — Runs
- Gemma 3 27B (Q8_0) — Runs
- Llama 3.1 70B — Runs
- Llama 3.3 70B — Runs
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B — Runs
How the checks work
The fit is the Q4_K_M file size against the card's VRAM, with 1.5 GB kept for the runtime and an ~8K context. A published run counts only if the pair fits, the run is Q4-class, its source does not call it an estimate, it is under the bandwidth ceiling (memory bandwidth ÷ GB read per token: the whole file for a dense model, only the active experts' weights for a mixture-of-experts model such as gpt-oss-20b or Qwen3 30B-A3B, which is why those can post figures above bandwidth ÷ file size), it is not slower than the same card on a model twice its size, a single run is not slower than the same card on a larger dense model, and it is not one figure pasted across many cards. The whole matrix is downloadable as a CSV under CC BY 4.0.
As an Amazon Associate, SpecPicks earns from qualifying purchases. As an eBay Partner Network member, SpecPicks may earn a commission on eBay links.
This page is editorial synthesis based on publicly available information. No independent first-party benchmarking is reported.