Skip to main content

Can the Radeon RX 7900 XTX Run Llama 3.3 70B?

Offload

Not entirely. Llama 3.3 70B at Q4_K_M is a 42.5 GB download (Hugging Face file listing for bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF), about 18.5 GB more than the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 24 GB, so the remainder has to be offloaded to system RAM. Generation speed is then set by system-memory and PCIe bandwidth rather than by the GPU, so no tokens-per-second figure is quoted for this pair. The smallest card in this matrix that holds it entirely is the RTX A6000 48GB (48 GB).

Model file42.5 GBQ4_K_M
VRAM24 GBRadeon RX 7900 XTX
Headroom18.5 GB shortafter weights
Median speed0 cited runs
Bandwidth ceiling~23 tok/s960 GB/s ÷ 42.5 GB

Published runs for Llama 3.3 70B on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX

No published run for this pair has passed the checks yet.

More about this pair

How much VRAM does Llama 3.3 70B need?

The Q4_K_M file is 42.5 GB. Add roughly 1.5 GB for the runtime and an ~8K-token context, so about 44 GB of VRAM holds it comfortably. Longer contexts grow the KV cache and need more.

What is the fastest Llama 3.3 70B can generate on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX?

Generation reads every weight once per token, so the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 960 GB/s of memory bandwidth divided by the 42.5 GB file sets a ceiling near 23 tokens per second once the whole model is resident. Real runs land below it; SpecPicks rejects any published figure above it.

Check another pair

See the full matrix → · All Radeon RX 7900 XTX benchmarks →

Llama 3.3 70B on other GPUs

Other models on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX

How the checks work

The fit is the Q4_K_M file size against the card's VRAM, with 1.5 GB kept for the runtime and an ~8K context. A published run counts only if the pair fits, the run is Q4-class, its source does not call it an estimate, it is under the bandwidth ceiling above, and it is not one figure pasted across many cards. The whole matrix is downloadable as a CSV under CC BY 4.0.

As an Amazon Associate, SpecPicks earns from qualifying purchases.

This page is editorial synthesis based on publicly available information. No independent first-party benchmarking is reported.