Skip to main content

Can the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Run Qwen2.5 32B?

Offload

Not entirely. Qwen2.5 32B at Q4_K_M is a 19.9 GB download (Hugging Face file listing for bartowski/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF), about 3.9 GB more than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 16 GB, so the remainder has to be offloaded to system RAM. Generation speed is then set by system-memory and PCIe bandwidth rather than by the GPU, so no tokens-per-second figure is quoted for this pair. The smallest card in this matrix that holds it entirely is the RTX 3090 (24 GB).

Model file19.9 GBQ4_K_M
VRAM16 GBRTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Headroom3.9 GB shortafter weights
Median speed0 cited runs
Bandwidth ceiling~15 tok/s288 GB/s ÷ 19.9 GB

Published runs for Qwen2.5 32B on the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

No published run for this pair has passed the checks yet.

More about this pair

How much VRAM does Qwen2.5 32B need?

The Q4_K_M file is 19.9 GB. Add roughly 1.5 GB for the runtime and an ~8K-token context, so about 21.4 GB of VRAM holds it comfortably. Longer contexts grow the KV cache and need more.

What is the fastest Qwen2.5 32B can generate on the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

Generation reads every weight once per token, so the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 288 GB/s of memory bandwidth divided by the 19.9 GB file sets a ceiling near 15 tokens per second once the whole model is resident. Real runs land below it; SpecPicks rejects any published figure above it.

Check another pair

See the full matrix → · All RTX 4060 Ti 16GB benchmarks →

Qwen2.5 32B on other GPUs

Other models on the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

How the checks work

The fit is the Q4_K_M file size against the card's VRAM, with 1.5 GB kept for the runtime and an ~8K context. A published run counts only if the pair fits, the run is Q4-class, its source does not call it an estimate, it is under the bandwidth ceiling above, and it is not one figure pasted across many cards. The whole matrix is downloadable as a CSV under CC BY 4.0.

As an Amazon Associate, SpecPicks earns from qualifying purchases.

This page is editorial synthesis based on publicly available information. No independent first-party benchmarking is reported.