Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Radeon RX 7600 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 27% to 253%, including 87% in 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (5,371 vs 2,876). On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 7600 XT generates 53.7 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub (ROCm perf discussion, @wbruna)) against 41.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per llama.cpp GitHub), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Radeon RX 7600 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

AMD

Radeon RX 7600 XT

16 GB VRAM

Full Radeon RX 7600 XT benchmarks →

NVIDIA · Turing

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6 GB VRAM125W TDP$229 MSRP2019

Full NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER benchmarks →

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Radeon RX 7600 XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
vram gb	16	6
vram type	—	GDDR6
tdp w	—	125
cuda cores	—	1408

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Notebookcheck, Modders Inc, PC Guide, PCTestBench, HWBOT, TechPowerUp, Tom's Hardware and PassMark; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

Benchmark	Radeon RX 7600 XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, Notebookcheck	—	15,070 points
3DMark Fire Strike (Graphics) (higher is better) Source: Notebookcheck	—	15,855 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (higher is better) Source: Modders Inc, PC Guide, PCTestBench	7,465 points	3,299 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better) Source: HWBOT, PC Guide	5,920 points	1,677 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, Notebookcheck	2,354 points	1,248 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light (higher is better) Source: Notebookcheck	—	5,670 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better) Source: 3DMark	—	6,421 points
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics) (higher is better) Source: Notebookcheck	—	5,979 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better) Source: Modders Inc, PC Guide, PCTestBench	5,371 points	2,876 points
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (higher is better) Source: TechPowerUp	12,800 pts	—
Cinebench R23 multi (higher is better) Source: Tom's Hardware	42,500 pts	—
PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better) Source: PassMark	1,027 pts	807 pts

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Radeon RX 7600 XT

qwen3:8b: 711.0 tok/s (LocalLLaMA)
llama2:7b: 53.7 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub (ROCm perf discussion, @wbruna))
llama2:7b: 53.0 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub — Vulkan performance discussion)

All Radeon RX 7600 XT AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

qwen2.5:0.5b: 63.9 tok/s (LocalScore (Mozilla Builders))
llama2:7b: 41.4 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub)
llama2:7b: 41.4 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub)

All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Radeon RX 7600 XT or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 6 shared benchmarks on file, by 27% to 253%, including 87% in 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (5,371 vs 2,876).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 7600 XT generates 53.7 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub (ROCm perf discussion, @wbruna)) against 41.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per llama.cpp GitHub), best community run on file for each.