Skip to main content

Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Radeon RX 6700 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on all 4 shared benchmarks on file, by 23% to 143%, including 95% in 3DMark Time Spy (10,779 vs 5,521). On llama3.1:8b, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 generates 16.7 tokens/s (per DatabaseMart Blog) against 16.4 for the Radeon RX 6700 XT (per LocalScore), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Radeon RX 6700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660. Released 2021 (Radeon RX 6700 XT), 2019 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660). MSRP range: $479 · $219. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecRadeon RX 6700 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
vram gb 126
vram type —GDDR5
tdp w —120
cuda cores —1408

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Wccftech, The FPS Review, UL Benchmarks, HWBOT, CpuTronic, TechPowerUp, TopCPU.net, Legit Reviews, GPU-Monkey and PassMark; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkRadeon RX 6700 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark		 —12,365 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme (Graphics score, reported rounded) (higher is better)
Source: Wccftech		 17,400 points—
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Graphics score, reported rounded) (higher is better)
Source: Wccftech		 8,500 points—
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: The FPS Review		 5,839 points—
3DMark Port Royal (reported rounded) (higher is better)
Source: Wccftech		 5,800 points—
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark		 2,311 points—
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: UL Benchmarks, HWBOT, CpuTronic		 2,546 points1,047 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: The FPS Review, TechPowerUp, TopCPU.net, CpuTronic, 3DMark, Legit Reviews		 10,779 points5,521 points
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics score, reported rounded) (higher is better)
Source: Wccftech		 12,000 points—
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (Graphics score, reported rounded) (higher is better)
Source: Wccftech		 5,600 points—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (higher is better)
Source: GPU-Monkey		 —5,395 points
PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark		 954 pts776 pts

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Radeon RX 6700 XT

All Radeon RX 6700 XT AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Radeon RX 6700 XT or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660?

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on all 4 shared benchmarks on file, by 23% to 143%, including 95% in 3DMark Time Spy (10,779 vs 5,521).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama3.1:8b, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 generates 16.7 tokens/s (per DatabaseMart Blog) against 16.4 for the Radeon RX 6700 XT (per LocalScore), best community run on file for each.

What did the Radeon RX 6700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 cost at launch?

The Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at a $479 MSRP and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 at $219. Street prices drift from launch pricing; the Where to buy section links current listings.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →