Radeon RX 9070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — Specs & Performance Compared
Verdict: The Radeon RX 9070 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 63% to 487%, including 340% in 3DMark Time Spy (24,306 vs 5,521). On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 9070 generates 119.7 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Vulkan scoreboard) against 41.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (per knightli.com), best community run on file for each.
Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Radeon RX 9070 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660. Released 2025 (Radeon RX 9070), 2019 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660). MSRP range: $549 · $219. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.
Where to buy
A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Radeon RX 9070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| vram gb | 16 | 6 |
| vram type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| tdp w | 220 | 120 |
| cuda cores | 3584 | 1408 |
| rt cores | 56 | — |
| process nm | 4 | — |
Synthetic benchmarks
Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Notebookcheck, StorageReview, Guru3D, TechPowerUp, UL Benchmarks, CpuTronic, Overclocking.com, TopCPU.net, Legit Reviews, GPU-Monkey and PassMark; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.
| Benchmark | Radeon RX 9070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, Notebookcheck |
46,934 points | 12,365 points |
| 3DMark Port Royal (higher is better) Source: StorageReview |
15,760 points | — |
| 3DMark Port Royal (RX 9070 XT reference) (higher is better) Source: Guru3D |
14,723 points | — |
| 3DMark Solar Bay (higher is better) Source: Notebookcheck |
106,882 points | — |
| 3DMark Speed Way (higher is better) Source: StorageReview, Notebookcheck |
5,826 points | — |
| 3DMark Speed Way (RX 9070 XT reference) (higher is better) Source: TechPowerUp |
6,345 points | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better) Source: StorageReview, UL Benchmarks, CpuTronic, Notebookcheck, Overclocking.com |
6,150 points | 1,047 points |
| 3DMark Time Spy (higher is better) Source: TopCPU.net, CpuTronic, 3DMark, Legit Reviews |
24,306 points | 5,521 points |
| 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better) Source: 3DMark |
11,702 points | — |
| 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (RX 9070 XT reference) (higher is better) Source: TechPowerUp |
14,591 points | — |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (higher is better) Source: GPU-Monkey |
— | 5,395 points |
| PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better) Source: PassMark |
1,266 pts | 776 pts |
AI inference (tokens/sec)
Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.
Radeon RX 9070
- qwen3:8b: 711.0 tok/s (LocalLLaMA)
- llama3.2:1b: 163.0 tok/s (LocalScore (Mozilla Builders))
- phi-2: 139.2 tok/s (StorageReview)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- qwen3:0.6b: 47.1 tok/s (LocalLLaMA)
- llama2:7b: 41.4 tok/s (knightli.com)
- llama2:7b: 41.4 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub (CUDA performance scoreboard))
Quick answers
Which is faster, the Radeon RX 9070 or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660?
The Radeon RX 9070 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 63% to 487%, including 340% in 3DMark Time Spy (24,306 vs 5,521).
Which is better for running local LLMs?
On llama2:7b, the Radeon RX 9070 generates 119.7 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Vulkan scoreboard) against 41.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (per knightli.com), best community run on file for each.
What did the Radeon RX 9070 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 cost at launch?
The Radeon RX 9070 launched at a $549 MSRP and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 at $219. Street prices drift from launch pricing; the Where to buy section links current listings.
Keep exploring
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 Parts List
- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- Running a 26B LLM Locally With No GPU: The CPU Setup Guide
- Intel llm-scaler-vllm 1.4: Arc Pro B70 Inference Support Lands
- Best Plug-and-Play Retro Console to Buy in 2026
- Intel Arc B580 vs RTX 3060 12GB for Local LLMs in 2026
- The KVM That Runs a Pentium 4 Instead of a Raspberry Pi
- Using Claude to Hunt PCI Device IDs on Win98: Voodoo, Audigy, GeForce 4 Ti
- Best CPU Under $300 for a 1080p Gaming Build (2026)
- Best SSD for a Local AI / LLM Workstation in 2026
- Best 4K Gaming Monitors Under $600 in 2026
- Sound Blaster Audigy FX in a Period-Correct Win98 Gaming Build
- 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 PCI Boots in a Modern ASUS Z77 Board
- Mistral Robostral Navigate: An 8B Model Steers Robots From One Camera
- SteamOS Boots on Intel Hardware in Community Hack
- OpenAI and Anthropic Are Giving Startups Free Compute — Here's the Local Rig That Replaces It
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 5080: Which Should You Buy in 2026?
- Noctua NH-U12S vs ML240L RGB on a Ryzen 7 5800X
- GeForce 4 Ti 4600 vs GeForce FX 5900: The Last Great AGP Cards Compared (2026)
- Best AM4 Upgrade Parts Under $100 Each in 2026
- Best Budget PC Upgrades Under $200 in 2026: 5 Picks That Move the Needle
- Best SteamOS Handheld Gaming PCs in 2025: What to Buy
- Alienware AW3426DW Review: QD-OLED Ultrawide Gaming at $699
- Best SATA SSD for Gaming and Game-Library Storage in 2026
- Logitech G502 Hero vs Modern FPS Mice: Is the Classic Still Worth It in 2026?
- GPT-5.6 Sol matches Fable 5 near one-third the cost
More buying guides from SpecPicks
Browse all buying guides →- Best 1440p 240Hz Gaming Monitors in 2026
- Best Tools for Building and Repairing Retro PCs in 2026
- Best Gaming Monitors for 2026
- Best GPU for Running 27B-32B Local LLMs in 2026
- Best Gaming Mice for 2026
- Best CPUs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best PC Cases for Building in 2026
- Best GPUs for 4K Gaming in 2026
- Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2026
- Best External SSDs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best CPUs for Gaming in 2026
- Best DDR5 RAM for Gaming PCs in 2026
- Best Mechanical Keyboards for Gaming in 2026
- Best CPU Coolers for 2026
- Best Retro Gaming Consoles & Handhelds for 2026
- Best 4K Monitors for Content Creators in 2026
- Best NVMe SSDs for Gaming in 2026
- Best Controllers for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best NVMe External Enclosures for 2026
- Best GPUs for Running Local LLMs in 2026
- Best AM5 Motherboards for 2026
Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks
All benchmarks →- GRID RTX6000P-4Q — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M1 Pro 8 Core 3200 MHz — benchmarks & specs
- GeForce RTX 4090 D — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7735U — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS — benchmarks & specs
- RTX 4000 Ada Generation — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — benchmarks & specs
- Hailo-8 AI Processor — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7520C — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Arc A370M — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS Creator Edition — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 2600X — benchmarks & specs
- GeForce RTX 4060 — benchmarks & specs
- RTX6000-Ada-6Q — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940H — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 5500U — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Arc B570 — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U — benchmarks & specs

