AMD Radeon RX 9070 — Benchmarks & Specs
Short answer: the AMD Radeon RX 9070 generates a median 99.4 tokens/sec on 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 5 cited runs from KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, llama.cpp GitHub, vachsark.com and localaimaster.com. Its 16 GB of VRAM holds up to gpt-oss-20b at MXFP4 with an ~8K context, by the Will-It-Run matrix's sizing (14 of 23 models fit). At the $699.99 Amazon price checked 2 h ago (prices change), that is 142.0 tok/s per $1,000, the SpecPicks Value Index. That ranks #4 of 29 GPUs on tok/s per $1,000 in the SpecPicks value table (table built 2026-10-21 22:29 UTC).
- Median speed 99.4 tok/s 5 cited runs, 7-9B at Q4, llama.cpp
- Fits in 16 GB up to gpt-oss-20b at MXFP4 → at ~8K context; 14 of 23 models in the Will-It-Run matrix
- Lowest linked price $699.99 Amazon, checked ; prices change
- Value Index 142.0 tok/s per $1,000 median speed ÷ the price above
Bottom line: how fast is the Radeon RX 9070?
SpecPicks median: 99.4 tokens/sec across 5 cited single-user runs of 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp (range 81.7–114 tok/s), from KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, llama.cpp GitHub (2 runs), vachsark.com, localaimaster.com. At the $699.99 Amazon price of the cheapest linked listing (checked ; prices change), that is a SpecPicks Value Index of 142.0 tok/s per $1,000. At 1440p Maximum, the Radeon RX 9070 averages 126 fps in Final Fantasy XIV Dawntrail, per Gamers Nexus. For local LLM inference it generates 54.9 tokens/sec running qwen3-coder:14b at q4_K_M under llama.cpp, per vachsark.com. In 3DMark Solar Bay it scores 106,882 points, per Notebookcheck. Its 16 GB of VRAM is the binding constraint for local inference: the largest model on file at 4-bit quantization on this card is gpt-oss:20b (20B parameters, q4_K_M), generating 91.9 tokens/sec under ollama, per GitHub hirokuze/local-llm-benchmark-rx9070xt.
Every figure above is a row in the tables below, and each row links out to the review or public benchmark database the number was taken from; the SpecPicks median is computed here from the runs it names, each a row in the AI table, and the per-$1,000 figure divides it by the dated listing price. SpecPicks aggregates published measurements; it does not report first-party benchmark runs.
Amazon listing: $699.99
This Amazon listing is above the Radeon RX 9070's $549 launch MSRP. Compare new and used listings on eBay before buying.
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated 2026-10-21. Price and availability subject to change.
Read the full comparison → RX 9070 XT vs RTX 3060 12GB for Local LLMs
Check what fits in 16 GB: by Q4-class file size, 14 of the 23 open-weight models in the SpecPicks Will-It-Run matrix load entirely into the AMD Radeon RX 9070's 16 GB with 1.5 GB left for an ~8K context, up to gpt-oss-20b (a 12.1 GB MXFP4 file per its Hugging Face listing). Check a model in the Will-It-Run matrix →
The Radeon RX 9070 is a graphics card from the RDNA 4 family released in 2025 from AMD. Key on-paper specs include 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, 220W TDP. It launched with a $549 MSRP, though street prices typically diverge meaningfully from launch pricing — see the linked product cards below for current listings. Data on this page draws on 11 linked listings, 18 synthetic benchmark results (top 10 shown), 25 community AI inference reports (top 15 shown), 99 measured game frame-rate results (top 15 shown), compiled from PCGamesN, Gamers Nexus, vachsark.com, StorageReview, GitHub hirokuze/local-llm-benchmark-rx9070xt, KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, llama.cpp GitHub, localaimaster.com, Notebookcheck, TechPowerUp, 3DMark, digtvbg.com, Guru3D, LocalLLaMA, LocalScore.ai, PassMark, UL Benchmarks; each table row links to its source. Read this page when shopping the Radeon RX 9070, comparing it against other graphics cards in your build, or sizing it for a specific workload (gaming at 1080p/1440p/4K, synthetic benchmark scores, or local LLM inference).
Gaming Performance (measured FPS)
Average and 1% low frame rates by game, resolution, and quality preset. Bars are scaled against the fastest result on this page.
| Game | Resolution | Settings | Relative | Avg FPS | 1% low | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doom Eternal | 1440p | Ultra | 447 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-10 | |
| Doom Eternal | 1440p | Ultra Nightmare | 447 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-05 | |
| Doom Eternal | 1440p | RT Ultra RT on | 289 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-10 | |
| Doom Eternal | 1440p | Ultra Nightmare RT on | 289 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-05 | |
| Doom Eternal | 4K | Ultra | 260 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-10 | |
| Doom Eternal | 4K | Ultra Nightmare | 260 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-05 | |
| Resident Evil 4 | 1080p | Prioritize Graphics | 247 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03-07 | |
| Resident Evil 4 (2023) | 1080p | Ultra | 247 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03 | |
| Resident Evil 4 | 1440p | Prioritize Graphics | 172 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03-07 | |
| Resident Evil 4 (2023) | 1440p | Ultra | 172 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03 | |
| F1 24 | 4K | Ultra High RT on FSR Quality | 168 fps | — | PCGamesN 2025-03-10 | |
| Doom Eternal | 4K | RT Ultra RT on | 163 fps | 108 fps | PCGamesN 2025-03-10 | |
| Doom Eternal | 4K | Ultra Nightmare RT on | 163 fps | 108 fps | PCGamesN 2025-03-05 | |
| Resident Evil 4 (2023) | 1440p | RT Ultra RT on | 162 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03 | |
| Final Fantasy XIV Dawntrail | 1440p | Maximum | 126 fps | — | Gamers Nexus 2025-03-06 |
AI Inference Performance
Tokens per second under each model + quantization. Higher = faster generation. Bars compare runs across the same model.
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen3:8b | Q8_0 llama.cpp | 711.0 tok/s | — | LocalLLaMA 2026-03-27 | |
| llama3.2:1b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 163.0 tok/s | — | LocalScore.ai retrieved 2026-06-10 | |
| phi-2 | — ONNX/DirectML | 139.2 tok/s | — | StorageReview 2025-03-05 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp (Vulkan) | 119.7 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub (Vulkan scoreboard) 2025-03-06 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp (Vulkan, flash attention on) | 119.5 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub (Vulkan scoreboard) 2025-03-06 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp (ROCm/HIP, flash attention on) | 115.3 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub ROCm scoreboard 2025-08 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 114.5 tok/s | — | KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard 2026-04-23 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 114.5 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub Discussion 2025-03 | |
| mistral:7b | — ONNX/DirectML | 101.3 tok/s | — | StorageReview 2025-03-05 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 99.4 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15021 2025-04 | |
| gpt-oss:20b | q4_K_M ollama | 91.9 tok/s | — | GitHub hirokuze/local-llm-benchmark-rx9070xt 2025-06 | |
| qwen3:8b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 84.3 tok/s | — | vachsark.com 2025-04 | |
| qwen3.5:9b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 81.7 tok/s | — | localaimaster.com 2025-05 | |
| qwen3-coder:14b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 54.9 tok/s | — | vachsark.com 2025-04 |
Batched serving throughput
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec (aggregate) | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen3.5:9b | q6_K_XL vllm batched | 48.0 tok/s aggregate | — | digtvbg.com 2026-03-22 |
Synthetic Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bars are scaled within each benchmark family (multi-thread, single-thread, etc.) so you can compare like-with-like at a glance.
| Benchmark | Relative | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 106,882 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-08-18 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 46,934 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-08-18 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 25,397 pts | PassMark retrieved 2026-04-20 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 24,306 points | 3DMark 2025-03 | |
| 3DMark Port Royal | 15,760 points | StorageReview 2025-03-05 | |
| 3DMark Port Royal (RX 9070 XT reference) | 14,723 points | Guru3D 2025-02 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (RX 9070 XT reference) | 14,591 points | TechPowerUp 2025-02 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 11,702 points | 3DMark.com 2025-04 | |
| 3DMark Speed Way (RX 9070 XT reference) | 6,345 points | TechPowerUp 2025-02 | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 6,312 points | UL Benchmarks 2025-03 |
Products Featuring the Radeon RX 9070
Systems with the Radeon RX 9070
Laptops and desktops that ship with the Radeon RX 9070 — whole systems, listed separately from the part itself.
Full Specifications
| ROPs | 128 |
|---|---|
| TMUs | 224 |
| TDP | 220 W |
| Opengl | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 |
| Directx | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Foundry | TSMC |
| Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| VRAM | 16 GB |
| GPU chip | Navi 48 |
| L2 cache | 8 MB |
| RT cores | 56 |
| Bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 |
| CUDA cores | 3584 |
| Generation | Navi IV (RX 9000) |
| Process | 4 nm |
| GPU variant | Navi 48 XT (215-176600331) |
| Spec source | TechPowerUp GPU Database |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 |
Radeon RX 9070 — Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Radeon RX 9070 best used for?
When was the Radeon RX 9070 released, and what was its launch MSRP?
Where do the Radeon RX 9070 benchmark numbers come from?
Can the Radeon RX 9070 run local LLMs?
Where can I buy the Radeon RX 9070?
Buying guides that rank the Radeon RX 9070's class
This page is the raw performance data. The guides below turn it into a ranked pick for a specific build.
Editorial guides covering the Radeon RX 9070
In-depth SpecPicks reviews, build guides, and head-to-heads referencing this graphics card.
- $1,500 Gaming PC Build 2026: Parts, Cost, 1440p FPS
- Best AMD GPU for 4K Gaming in 2026
- gpt-oss on a 12GB GPU: 2026 Community Consensus (RTX 3060)
- Best GPU for Local LLMs by VRAM: 2026 Reddit Consensus
- Used RTX 3090 vs New GPU for Local LLMs: 2026 Reddit Consensus
- RTX 3060 12GB Local LLM: Reddit Consensus on What Runs (2026)
- Gemma 4 31B on a 16GB GPU: RTX 5060 Ti vs RX 9060 XT vs Arc A770 Quant Table (2026)
- FLUX.2 Klein 4B for Halloween Art: RTX 3060 12GB vs RTX 5060 8GB
- Browse all SpecPicks reviews →
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 ($800 on Sale)
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- Qwen 3.6 27B Matches Sonnet 4.6 on Artificial Analysis Agency
- Raspberry Pi Home Automation Projects: A 2025 Starter Guide
- Run Qwen 3.6 27B Locally: VRAM, Quant & tok/s on a 12GB RTX 3060
- CompactFlash as a Win98 Boot Drive: Transcend CF133 + IDE Adapter Walkthrough
- Run DeepSeek & Qwen Locally on an RTX 3060 12GB (2026 Guide)
- 32GB of DDR5 Drops to $240 in New Newegg Build Bundles
- Best Streaming Kit for Beginners in 2026: Mic, Cam, and Lights
- Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike: The $125.99 Deal Has Expired
- Best Sim Racing Wheel Under $300 in 2026: Force Feedback That's Worth It
- Jetson Orin Nano Super vs Coral USB: Which One Runs an LLM?
- Bigme Color E-Ink Monitor: 60 FPS and 4096 Colors Explained
- Best SATA SSD for a Retro Windows XP or 98 Build (2026)
- Hailo-8 vs Hailo-8L vs Coral TPU: Which AI Accelerator Wins on Raspberry Pi 5?
- 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 AGP tuning guide — 2026 edition
- Best Controller for PC Gaming in 2026: Wired vs Wireless Compared
- Best Retro PC Storage Adapters in 2026: IDE, SATA & CompactFlash Picks
- Best Wireless Gaming Controllers for PC and Console in 2026
- Stable Diffusion WebUI Forge in 2026: Faster Inference on the RTX 3060 12GB
- Best PC Cooling Solutions for AM4 and AM5 Builds in 2026
- Crucial BX500 vs Samsung 870 EVO: Best 1TB SATA SSD for Game Storage
- GPT-5.6 Rollout Now Requires US Government Sign-Off, Customer by Customer
- Best Microphones for Streaming and Podcasting (2026)
- 3D-Printed Retro PC Case Fits ITX Board, ATX PSU
- Cursor vs Cline vs Aider for Local-First AI Coding in 2026
More buying guides from SpecPicks
Browse all buying guides →- Best Gaming Monitors for 2026
- Best 1440p 240Hz Gaming Monitors in 2026
- Best Gaming Mice for 2026
- Best NVMe External Enclosures for 2026
- Best DDR5 RAM for Gaming PCs in 2026
- Best GPUs for Running Local LLMs in 2026
- Best GPU for Running 27B-32B Local LLMs in 2026
- Best Tools for Building and Repairing Retro PCs in 2026
- Best GPUs for 4K Gaming in 2026
- Best AM5 Motherboards for 2026
- Best Controllers for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best PC Cases for Building in 2026
- Best CPUs for Gaming in 2026
- Best CPUs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best Mechanical Keyboards for Gaming in 2026
- Best External SSDs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best CPU Coolers for 2026
- Best 4K Monitors for Content Creators in 2026
- Best NVMe SSDs for Gaming in 2026
- Best Retro Gaming Consoles & Handhelds for 2026
- Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2026
Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks
All benchmarks →- GRID RTX6000P-6Q — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 5600X — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 9 5900X — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GE — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon 9700 Pro — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840HX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 9500F — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 7 5800X — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6450M — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Core i9-14900K — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 5400U — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 9900X — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 7500 — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 7900 XTX — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6550M — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6600 — benchmarks & specs