AMD
Ryzen 5 2600X
6 cores95W TDP
Full Ryzen 5 2600X benchmarks →
Side-by-side CPU comparison of the Ryzen 5 2600X and the Ryzen 7 2700X. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.
A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.
| Spec | Ryzen 5 2600X | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| cores | 6 | 8 |
| threads | 12 | 16 |
| base clock ghz | 3.6 | 3.7 |
| boost clock ghz | 4.25 | — |
| tdp w | 95 | 105 |
| memory bus | Dual-channel | — |
| l3 cache mb | 16 | — |
| process nm | 12 | — |
| socket | AMD Socket AM4 | — |
Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from Gamers Nexus, GadgetVersus, CGDirector, Geekbench Browser, NanoReview, CpuTronic, PassMark Software and numberworld.org; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.
| Benchmark | Ryzen 5 2600X | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 7-Zip Decompression (higher is better) Source: Gamers Nexus |
— | 89,000 MIPS |
| Cinebench R23 multi (higher is better) Source: GadgetVersus, CGDirector |
7,523 points | 10,715 points |
| Cinebench R23 single (higher is better) Source: GadgetVersus, CGDirector |
1,094 points | 1,110 points |
| Geekbench 6 multi (higher is better) Source: Geekbench Browser, NanoReview, GadgetVersus, CpuTronic |
5,565 points | 6,487 points |
| Geekbench 6 single (higher is better) Source: Geekbench Browser, NanoReview, GadgetVersus, CpuTronic |
1,274 points | 1,269 points |
| PassMark CPU Mark (higher is better) Source: PassMark Software |
13,867 points | 17,434 points |
| PassMark Single Thread (higher is better) Source: PassMark Software |
2,378 points | — |
| PassMark Single Thread Rating (higher is better) Source: PassMark Software |
— | 2,413 points |
| Y-cruncher 1B (lower is better) Source: numberworld.org |
— | 78 |