Skip to main content

GeForce RTX 5050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The GeForce RTX 5050 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 7 shared benchmarks on file, by 34% to 265%, including 55% in 3DMark Time Spy (9,954 vs 6,421). On qwen2.5:7b, the GeForce RTX 5050 generates 29.0 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussions) against 18.2 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per databasemart.com), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the GeForce RTX 5050 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecGeForce RTX 5050NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
vram gb 86
vram type —GDDR6
tdp w —125
cuda cores —1408

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Tweaktown, Notebookcheck, Modders Inc, PCTestBench, HWBOT, Overclocking.com, Gizbot, Club386, UL Benchmarks and TechPowerUp; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkGeForce RTX 5050NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, Tweaktown, Notebookcheck		 27,162 points15,070 points
3DMark Fire Strike (Graphics) (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 —15,855 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc, PCTestBench		 —3,299 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: HWBOT, Tweaktown, Overclocking.com, 3DMark		 6,128 points1,677 points
3DMark Solar Bay (higher is better)
Source: Gizbot		 45,781 points—
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better)
Source: Tweaktown, Club386, Overclocking.com, Notebookcheck		 2,454 points—
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: UL Benchmarks, Tweaktown, Club386, Overclocking.com, Notebookcheck		 2,287 points1,248 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 10,057 points5,670 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, Tweaktown, Gizbot, Notebookcheck		 9,954 points6,421 points
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics) (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 —5,979 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc, PCTestBench		 —2,876 points
3DMark Time Spy GPU (higher is better)
Source: TechPowerUp		 21,500 pts—

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

GeForce RTX 5050

All GeForce RTX 5050 AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the GeForce RTX 5050 or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?

The GeForce RTX 5050 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 7 shared benchmarks on file, by 34% to 265%, including 55% in 3DMark Time Spy (9,954 vs 6,421).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On qwen2.5:7b, the GeForce RTX 5050 generates 29.0 tokens/s (per llama.cpp GitHub Discussions) against 18.2 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per databasemart.com), best community run on file for each.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →