Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc A770 — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Intel Arc A770 is ahead of the Intel Arc A750 on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 3% to 14%, including 13% in 3DMark Time Spy (14,012 vs 12,415). On qwen3:8b, the Intel Arc A770 generates 45.5 tokens/s (per diunox/arc-inference-bench (GitHub)) against 18.0 for the Intel Arc A750 (per LocalLLaMA), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Intel Arc A750 and the Intel Arc A770. Both released in 2022. MSRP range: $289 · $349. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

Intel · Alchemist

Intel Arc A750

8 GB VRAM225W TDP$289 MSRP2022

Full Intel Arc A750 benchmarks →

Intel · Alchemist

Intel Arc A770

16 GB VRAM225W TDP$349 MSRP2022

Full Intel Arc A770 benchmarks →

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Intel Arc A750	Intel Arc A770
vram gb	8	16
vram type	GDDR6	GDDR6
tdp w	225	225

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from Geeks3D, PC Unboxing, 3DMark, ComputerBase, The FPS Review and Impulse Gamer; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

Benchmark	Intel Arc A750	Intel Arc A770
3DMark DirectX Raytracing feature test (higher is better) Source: Geeks3D	29 fps	—
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better) Source: Geeks3D	31,431 points	—
3DMark Fire Strike (GPU subscore) (higher is better) Source: PC Unboxing	—	33,666 points
3DMark Fire Strike (Graphics sub-score) (higher is better) Source: Geeks3D	31,431 points	—
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme (GPU subscore) (higher is better) Source: PC Unboxing	—	15,638 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (GPU subscore) (higher is better) Source: PC Unboxing	—	7,016 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better) Source: Geeks3D, 3DMark, PC Unboxing	6,512 points	8,731 points
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, Geeks3D	2,320 points	2,531 points
3DMark Speed Way Stress Test (higher is better) Source: 3DMark	—	2,531 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, ComputerBase	2,609 points	2,969 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better) Source: The FPS Review, 3DMark, Geeks3D, Impulse Gamer	12,415 points	14,012 points
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics sub-score) (higher is better) Source: Geeks3D	12,264 points	—

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Intel Arc A750

qwen2.5-coder:0.5b: 150.0 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub Discussions)
qwen2.5-coder:0.5b: 150.0 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #12805)
qwen2.5-coder:0.5b: 150.0 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #12805 (Arc A750 self-hosting 2025))

All Intel Arc A750 AI benchmarks →

Intel Arc A770

mistral:7b: 70.0 tok/s (Intel Gaming Access)
mistral:7b: 70.0 tok/s (Markaicode)
mistral:7b: 70.0 tok/s (GigaChad LLC)

All Intel Arc A770 AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Intel Arc A750 or the Intel Arc A770?

The Intel Arc A770 is ahead of the Intel Arc A750 on all 5 shared benchmarks on file, by 3% to 14%, including 13% in 3DMark Time Spy (14,012 vs 12,415).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On qwen3:8b, the Intel Arc A770 generates 45.5 tokens/s (per diunox/arc-inference-bench (GitHub)) against 18.0 for the Intel Arc A750 (per LocalLLaMA), best community run on file for each.

What did the Intel Arc A750 and the Intel Arc A770 cost at launch?

The Intel Arc A750 launched at a $289 MSRP and the Intel Arc A770 at $349. Street prices drift from launch pricing; the Where to buy section links current listings.