Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, NVMe 2.0 PCIe 4.0 x 4/5.0x2, 4TB, Read Speed up to 7250MB/s, Ideal for Gaming and Office, MZ-V9S4T0BW
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated 2026-07-22. Price and availability subject to change.
Bottom line: The Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, NVMe 2.0 PCIe 4.0 x 4/5.0x2, 4TB, Read Speed up to 7250MB/s, Ideal for Gaming and Office, MZ-V9S4T0BW is a niche pick — read recent reviews before buying in the ssds & storage category, priced around $720.00. Read recent reviews carefully before committing.
Discover the new Internal 990 EVO Plus SSD that combines performance, energy efficiency, versatility and flexibility to improve your everyday performance! Enjoy 73% improved energy efficiency over the previous version**, while maintaining performance and thermal control. The 990 EVO Plus allows you to significantly reduce PC game loading times and access time to large files! Enjoy its sequential read/write speed up to 7250/6300 MB/s*. Say goodbye to overheating with the 990 EVO Plus and its intelligent thermal solution. It is ideal for gamers, professionals or creators. Finally, you have…
SpecPicks Verdict
SpecPicks classifies Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, NVMe 2.0 PCIe 4.0 x 4/5.0x2, 4TB… as a niche pick — read recent reviews before buying in the ssds & storage category, based on our editorial and benchmark analysis and our ranking model that weights rating × review-volume × price-fit. Use the Compare tool to put it side-by-side with two or three close alternatives before clicking through to Amazon.
Common buyer scenarios for ssds & storage of this kind: matching it to an existing build, replacing a failing part, or upgrading from a previous-generation equivalent. Check the spec table below against your current setup — particularly socket / form-factor / power-rating fields — and confirm compatibility on the Amazon listing before purchase. Prices, stock, and Prime eligibility update directly from Amazon's catalog and may have moved since this page was last verified.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓ Speed up to the next level: Sequential read/write speed up to 7250/6300 MB/s*
- ✓ Ships via Amazon with Prime eligibility and the standard returns policy
Cons
- ✗ Confirm socket / form-factor / power-rating compatibility against your build before ordering
- ✗ Price, stock, and Prime eligibility update from Amazon and may have changed since this page was last verified
Key Features
- Speed up to the next level: Sequential read/write speed up to 7250/6300 MB/s*
- Increased energy performance**: Enjoy reduced load time for PC games or access time for large files
- Intelligent thermal solution: for efficient thermal control of the NAND chip that ensures consistent performance
- Versatility and flexibility: thanks to PCIe 4.0 x4 and PCIe 5.0 x2 interfaces
- Samsung Magician Management Software*** to monitor SSD health and benefit from the latest firmware updates
- Box contents: 1 x Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, 4TB, NVMe 2.0, PCIe 4.0 x4 / 5.0 x2, MZ-V9S4T0BW
Full Specifications
| Brand | Samsung |
|---|---|
| Color | Black |
| Model Name | 990 EVO Plus |
| Read Speed | 7250 Megabytes Per Second |
| Unit Count | 1.0 Count |
| Form Factor | M2 |
| Media Speed | 6300 megabytes_per_second |
| Box contents | 1 x Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, 4TB, NVMe 2.0, PCIe 4.0 x4 / 5.0 x2, MZ-V9S4T0BW |
| Model Number | MZ-V9S4T0BW |
| Compatibility | PC |
| Built-In Media | Samsung SSD 990 EVO Plus, Installation Instructions, Instruction Manual |
| Hard-Drive Size | 4 TB |
| Mfr Part Number | MZ-V9S4T0BW |
| Number of Items | 1 |
Ready to buy?
Samsung Internal SSD 990 EVO Plus, NVMe 2.0 PCIe 4.0 x 4/5.0x2, 4TB, Read Speed up to 7250MB/s, Ideal for Gaming and Office, MZ-V9S4T0BW is available on Amazon with Prime shipping and the full Amazon returns policy. SpecPicks earns a small commission on qualifying purchases — thank you for supporting independent review work.
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated 2026-07-22. Price and availability subject to change.
Related SSDs & Storage
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 ($800 on Sale)
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- RTX 3060 12GB vs RTX 4060 for 1080p Gaming: Which Wins in 2026?
- Build an Always-On Raspberry Pi Zero W Project: 24/7 FM Radio and More
- Building a Budget Sim Racing Setup: Logitech G920 vs Thrustmaster TH8A Shifter
- RTX 5080 vs RTX 5070: Which Blackwell GPU Should You Buy in 2026?
- KOORUI 27" 4K vs Samsung Odyssey 27" 4K for PS5 and PC Gaming
- Build a Budget Self-Hosted Game Server on a Ryzen 5 5600G in 2026
- Build a PiKVM V3 Device for Remote Server Management (2026)
- How to run Llama 3.1 70B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
- Running local LLMs on the Ryzen 5 5600G iGPU (no dedicated GPU) in 2026
- Ryzen 7 5700X vs 5800X for a 2026 Gaming Build: Which AM4 Chip Wins?
- Jan vs LM Studio: The Best No-Terminal Local LLM App for an RTX 3060 (2026)
- Best 4K Gaming Monitor Under $700 in 2026
- Best Plug-and-Play Retro Console to Buy in 2026
- Best Gaming Mouse for FPS Esports Under $100 (2026)
- Crucial BX500 vs Samsung 870 EVO: Best Budget 1TB SATA SSD for Gaming in 2026
- DGX Spark vs Mac Studio M3 Ultra: Which AI Dev Machine Wins in 2026?
- Best Controller for PC AAA Gaming in 2026
- Steam Deck OLED vs ROG Xbox Ally X: Which Handheld Wins?
- LattePanda Sigma vs Raspberry Pi 4 8GB: x86 Windows SBC vs ARM Linux for Edge AI Workloads in 2026
- Best Budget SSD for Gaming PC Builds in 2026: 5 Picks
- llama.cpp MTP support landed - Qwen3.6 27B at 2.44× on a Strix Halo, 2.17× on a RTX 3090 rig
- Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Which Wins for Budget 1080p Gaming?
- Logitech G920 vs HORI Overdrive for Sim Racing in 2026
- Best Raspberry Pi Alternative in 2026: Pi vs Orange Pi vs Radxa