Skip to main content

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Radeon RX 5700 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 4 shared benchmarks on file, by 36% to 85%, including 37% in 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (3,950 vs 2,876). On llama3.1:8b, the Radeon RX 5700 XT generates 25.4 tokens/s (per LocalScore (Mozilla Builders)) against 16.7 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per databasemart.com), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Radeon RX 5700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

vs

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

SpecRadeon RX 5700 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
vram gb 86
vram type —GDDR6
tdp w —125
cuda cores —1408

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Notebookcheck, Modders Inc, PCTestBench, HWBOT, UL Benchmarks, TechPowerUp, PCBench, PassMark and Tom's Hardware; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

BenchmarkRadeon RX 5700 XTNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better)
Source: 3DMark, Notebookcheck		 —15,070 points
3DMark Fire Strike (Graphics) (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 —15,855 points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc, PCTestBench		 6,102 points3,299 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: HWBOT		 —1,677 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better)
Source: UL Benchmarks, Notebookcheck		 2,116 points1,248 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 —5,670 points
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better)
Source: TechPowerUp, 3DMark, PCBench		 8,710 points6,421 points
3DMark Time Spy (Graphics) (higher is better)
Source: Notebookcheck		 —5,979 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better)
Source: Modders Inc, PCTestBench		 3,950 points2,876 points
PassMark G2D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark		 —807 pts
PassMark G3D Mark (higher is better)
Source: PassMark		 —12,683 pts
Port Royal (higher is better)
Source: Tom's Hardware		 5,600 points—

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Radeon RX 5700 XT

All Radeon RX 5700 XT AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Radeon RX 5700 XT or the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on all 4 shared benchmarks on file, by 36% to 85%, including 37% in 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (3,950 vs 2,876).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama3.1:8b, the Radeon RX 5700 XT generates 25.4 tokens/s (per LocalScore (Mozilla Builders)) against 16.7 for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (per databasemart.com), best community run on file for each.

Keep exploring

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →