NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB — Benchmarks & Specs
Short answer: the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB generates 35.7 tokens/sec on llama3.1:8b-instruct (q4_K_M) under llamafile (llama.cpp) in a single cited run, per LocalScore; there are too few comparable runs on file for a median. Its 12 GB of VRAM holds up to Phi-4 14B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context, by the Will-It-Run matrix's sizing (13 of 27 models fit). A used eBay listing for it is $499.95, checked (listings can end at any time).
- Single cited run 35.7 tok/s llama3.1:8b-instruct q4_K_M, per LocalScore
- Fits in 12 GB up to Phi-4 14B at Q4_K_M → at ~8K context; 13 of 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix
Who should buy this instead: the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB's 12 GB puts it in the 12 GB tier of the local-LLM GPU picks by VRAM (one card per tier, each with cited tok/s). If the models you run fit in 8 GB, compare the 8 GB pick. If they need more than 12 GB, start at the 16 GB pick.
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB: verdict by use case
- For the largest model in 12 GB: Phi-4 14B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context; 13 of the 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix fit. By the same sizing, 65-73B models at Q4 do not fit, so 70B-class work needs a card with more VRAM or CPU offload.
- For gaming: 43 fps average in Forza Horizon 5 at 1440p Ultra, per Notebookcheck.
Each verdict quotes a figure from a linked source or a row in the tables below. Where no cited figure exists for a use case, there is no verdict line for it.
Bottom line: how fast is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB?
At 1440p Ultra, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB averages 43 fps in Forza Horizon 5, per Notebookcheck. For local LLM inference it generates 35.7 tokens/sec running llama3.1:8b-instruct at q4_K_M under llamafile (llama.cpp), per LocalScore. In Geekbench 5 CUDA it scores 83,470 points, per HardwareDB. Its 12 GB of VRAM is the binding constraint for local inference: the largest model on file at 4-bit quantization on this card is qwen2.5:14b (14.8B parameters, q4_K_M), generating 19.5 tokens/sec under llama.cpp, per LocalScore. That run's source does not report a context length; the Will-It-Run matrix sizes each model at its listed quantization with an ~8K context, and by that measure Phi-4 14B at Q4_K_M is the largest that fits in 12 GB.
Every figure above is a row in the tables below, and each row links out to the review or public benchmark database the number was taken from. SpecPicks aggregates published measurements; it does not report first-party benchmark runs.
eBay listing (Used): $499.95, checked . eBay listings are third-party and can end at any time; as an eBay Partner Network member, SpecPicks may earn a commission.
Check what fits in 12 GB: by file size at each listed quantization, 13 of the 27 open-weight model files in the SpecPicks Will-It-Run matrix load entirely into the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB's 12 GB while keeping at least 1.5 GB reserved for an ~8K context; the largest that fits, Phi-4 14B (a 9.1 GB Q4_K_M file per its Hugging Face listing), leaves roughly 2.9 GB free. Check a model in the Will-It-Run matrix →
What fits in the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB's 12 GB, and what doesn't
2 of these 7 model files load whole into 12 GB with room for an ~8K context. A file fits when the card keeps at least 1.5 GB free after the weights; file sizes are the GGUF downloads on Hugging Face. Speeds are this card's single-user generation speed from cited community runs at the Q4-class file listed; a row with no cited run says so rather than estimating one.
| Model | Quant | Fits in 12 GB? | Cited speed on this card |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B 4.9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~7.1 GB left for context | 35.7 tok/s1 cited run, llamafile (llama.cpp), per LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) |
| Qwen3 14B 9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~3 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| gpt-oss-20b 21B-A3.6B · 12.1 GB file | MXFP4 | Doesn't fit0.1 GB over; runs only with CPU offload | — (does not load into VRAM) |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B 18.6 GB file | Q4_K_M | Doesn't fit6.6 GB over; runs only with CPU offload | — (does not load into VRAM) |
| Qwen3 32B 19.8 GB file | Q4_K_M | Doesn't fit7.8 GB over; runs only with CPU offload | — (does not load into VRAM) |
| Gemma 3 27B 28.7 GB file | Q8_0 | Doesn't fit16.7 GB over; runs only with CPU offload | — (does not load into VRAM) |
| Llama 3.3 70B 42.5 GB file | Q4_K_M | Doesn't fit30.5 GB over; runs only with CPU offload | — (does not load into VRAM) |
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB is a graphics card from the Ampere Pro family released in 2021 from NVIDIA. Key on-paper specs include 12 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, 70W TDP. It launched with a $450 MSRP, though street prices typically diverge meaningfully from launch pricing. Data on this page draws on 17 synthetic benchmark results (top 10 shown), 5 community AI inference reports, 28 game frame-rate results (top 14 shown), compiled from Notebookcheck, LocalScore, CpuTronic, HardwareDB, topcpu.net GPU Performance Rankings, knightli.com llama.cpp GPU Scoreboards, PassMark; each table row links to its source. Read this page when shopping the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB, comparing it against other graphics cards in your build, or sizing it for a specific workload (gaming at 1080p/1440p/4K, synthetic benchmark scores, or local LLM inference).
Gaming Performance (reported FPS)
Average and 1% low frame rates by game, resolution, and quality preset. Bars are scaled against the fastest result on this page.
| Game | Resolution | Settings | Relative | Avg FPS | 1% low | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1080p | Ultra | 77 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1080p | Highest | 75 fps | — | topcpu.net GPU Performance Rankings 2026-04-29 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1080p | Highest | 73 fps | — | CpuTronic 2026-08-13 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1080p | High | 73 fps | — | CpuTronic 2026-07-09 | |
| Far Cry 6 | 1080p | Ultra | 68 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1080p | Ultra | 59 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1440p | Highest | 55 fps | — | topcpu.net GPU Performance Rankings 2026-04-29 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1440p | Highest | 54 fps | — | CpuTronic 2026-08-13 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1440p | High | 54 fps | — | CpuTronic 2026-07-09 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1080p | High | 52 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1440p | Ultra | 52 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 1080p | Ultra | 50 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1080p | Ultra | 45 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1440p | Ultra | 43 fps | — | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 |
AI Inference Performance
Tokens per second under each model + quantization. Higher = faster generation. Bars compare runs across the same model.
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llama3.2:1b-instruct | q4_K_M llamafile (llama.cpp) | 140.0 tok/s | — | LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) retrieved 2026-10-16 | |
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 45.5 tok/s | — | knightli.com llama.cpp GPU Scoreboards 2026-04-23 | |
| llama3.1:8b-instruct | q4_K_M llamafile (llama.cpp) | 35.7 tok/s | — | LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) retrieved 2026-10-16 | |
| qwen2.5:14b-instruct | q4_K_M llamafile (llama.cpp) | 19.5 tok/s | — | LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) retrieved 2026-10-16 | |
| qwen2.5:14b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 19.5 tok/s | — | LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) |
Synthetic Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bars are scaled within each benchmark family (multi-thread, single-thread, etc.) so you can compare like-with-like at a glance.
| Benchmark | Relative | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 5 CUDA | 83,470 points | HardwareDB retrieved 2026-04-29 | |
| Geekbench 5 OpenCL | 79,123 points | HardwareDB retrieved 2026-04-29 | |
| Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 72,991 points | HardwareDB retrieved 2026-04-29 | |
| Geekbench 6 Vulkan | 70,140 points | HardwareDB retrieved 2026-04-29 | |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 26,502 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 14,566 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 13,672 points | PassMark PerformanceTest retrieved 2026-04-29 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 13,670 points | PassMark retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 6,995 points | Notebookcheck 2024-09-07 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,282 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-06-09 |
Full Specifications
| TDP | 70 W |
|---|---|
| VRAM | 12 GB |
| CUDA cores | 3328 |
| Memory type | GDDR6 |
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB — Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB best used for?
When was the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB released, and what was its launch MSRP?
Where do the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB benchmark numbers come from?
Can the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB run local LLMs?
Where can I buy the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB?
Buying guides that rank the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB's class
This page is the raw performance data. The guides below turn it into a ranked pick for a specific build.
Editorial guides covering the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB
In-depth SpecPicks reviews, build guides, and head-to-heads referencing this graphics card.
- 1080p Gaming PC Build 2026: Cost, Parts, FPS
- $2,000 Gaming PC Build 2026: Parts, Cost, 1440p FPS
- $1,200 Gaming PC Build 2026: Parts, Cost, 1440p FPS
- RX 9060 XT 16GB vs 8GB: Which One to Buy (Benchmarks)
- $1,500 Gaming PC Build 2026: Parts, Cost, 1440p FPS
- 1440p Gaming PC Build 2026: Cost, Parts, FPS
- 4K Gaming PC Build 2026: Cost, Parts, FPS
- Can You Build an $800 Gaming PC in 2026? Parts + Cost
- Browse all SpecPicks reviews →
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 Parts List
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- Best Gaming Webcam and Microphone Bundle for Streamers in 2026
- Intel LLM-Scaler vLLM 1.4 on Arc Pro B70: What the Latest Driver Stack Means for Local Inference
- Acer Nitro 65 Review: Solid Gaming, Connectivity Caveats
- Samsung Winds Down Chip Production Six Days Before Strike: What Memory Buyers Should Do Right Now
- Best CPU Cooler for AM4 Ryzen 7 5800X Overclocking Under $100 in 2026
- Tesla Caps AI Spend at $200/Week — The Local RTX 3060 Rig Case
- Two RTX 3060 12GB vs One Bigger GPU for Local 70B Models
- Ryzen 7 5800X vs Ryzen 7 5700X for 1440p Gaming: Is the Premium Worth It?
- Best Retro PC Upgrade Kit 2026: Sound & Storage
- Gemini-SQL2 Tops Text-to-SQL: Can an RTX 3060 Run a Local SQL Model?
- Raspberry Pi 4 8GB as a Local LLM Box: What Models Actually Run?
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + RTX 5060 Combo Hits $439 With Free Cooler
- Is the KOORUI 27-Inch 4K QD-Mini LED a Good Match for an RTX 3060?
- RTX 5090 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D Benchmark Showdown: 2026 Performance Deep Dive
- Best GPU for 1080p High-Refresh Esports 2026: RTX 3060 12GB
- Air vs AIO for the Ryzen 7 5800X: Noctua NH-U12S vs CoolerMaster ML240L
- Raspberry Pi Locator Shuts Down in July: Where to Buy a Pi Now
- GLM-5.2 Is Now the Most Intelligent Open-Weights Model — and the Most Verbose
- Best CPU Coolers for a Quiet Ryzen Gaming PC in 2026
- Best Gaming Controllers for PC in 2026: 5 Picks Tested Across Genres
- Best Raspberry Pi 5 Starter Kits and Accessories for Home Lab Builds (2026)
- GameSir G7 SE vs DualSense vs 8BitDo Pro 2 for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best Mouse Pad for FPS and MOBA Esports Players (2026)
- Build a Pocket Retro Emulation Handheld on the Raspberry Pi Zero W in 2026
More buying guides from SpecPicks
Browse all buying guides →- Best DDR5 RAM for Gaming PCs in 2026
- Best AM5 Motherboards for 2026
- Best Gaming Monitors for 2026
- Best Controllers for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best PC Cases for Building in 2026
- Best 1440p 240Hz Gaming Monitors in 2026
- Best GPUs for Running Local LLMs in 2026
- Best NVMe External Enclosures for 2026
- Best Tools for Building and Repairing Retro PCs in 2026
- Best CPUs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best External SSDs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best CPU Coolers for 2026
- Best 4K Monitors for Content Creators in 2026
- Best Mechanical Keyboards for Gaming in 2026
- Best Gaming Mice for 2026
- Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2026
- Best NVMe SSDs for Gaming in 2026
- Best GPU for Running 27B-32B Local LLMs in 2026
- Best CPUs for Gaming in 2026
- Best GPUs for 4K Gaming in 2026
- Best Retro Gaming Consoles & Handhelds for 2026
Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks
All benchmarks →- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 7 4800H — benchmarks & specs
- Pentium 4 2.4B (Northwood) — benchmarks & specs
- GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Core Ultra 5 245K — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 2600X — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA RTX A4500 20GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640S — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80GB — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 5500 XT — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M3 Max 16 Core — benchmarks & specs
- GeForce RTX 4070 Ti — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8GB — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 7500X3D — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320C — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon 9700 Pro — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M3 8 Core — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500H — benchmarks & specs