AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB — Benchmarks & Specs
Short answer: the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB generates a median 161 tokens/sec on 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 3 cited runs from KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard and llama.cpp GitHub. Its 192 GB of VRAM holds up to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context, by the Will-It-Run matrix's sizing (27 of 27 models fit). A used eBay listing for it is $27,500.00, checked (listings can end at any time).
- Median speed 161 tok/s 3 cited runs, 7-9B at Q4, llama.cpp
- Fits in 192 GB up to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M → at ~8K context; 27 of 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix
Who should buy this instead: the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB's 192 GB puts it in the 48 GB+ tier of the local-LLM GPU picks by VRAM (one card per tier, each with cited tok/s). If the models you run fit in 24 GB, compare the 24 GB pick. If they need more than 192 GB, start at the 128 GB unified pick.
AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB: verdict by use case
- For everyday local models (7-9B dense): a median 161 tok/s at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 3 cited runs (KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, llama.cpp GitHub).
- For 70B-class local models (65-73B dense): a median 36.3 tok/s at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 5 cited runs (AMD ROCm Blog, llama.cpp GitHub).
- For the largest model in 192 GB: DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context; 27 of the 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix fit.
Each verdict quotes a figure from a linked source or a row in the tables below. Where no cited figure exists for a use case, there is no verdict line for it.
Bottom line: how fast is the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB?
SpecPicks median: 161 tokens/sec across 3 cited single-user runs of 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp (range 161–233 tok/s), from KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, llama.cpp GitHub (2 runs). For larger models, the SpecPicks median is 36.3 tokens/sec across 5 cited single-user runs of 65-73B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp (range 36.3–36.5 tok/s), from AMD ROCm Blog, llama.cpp GitHub (4 runs). One of those runs: llama3.1:70b at q4_K_M generates 36.3 tokens/sec under llama.cpp, per llama.cpp GitHub. In Geekbench 6 OpenCL it scores 379,660 points, per Geekbench Browser. It has 192 GB of VRAM, and the llama3.1:70b run above (70.6B parameters) is the largest model on file at 4-bit quantization on this card. Larger models have no sourced run on file. That run used a 512-token context; the Will-It-Run matrix sizes each model at its listed quantization with an ~8K context, and by that measure DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M is the largest that fits in 192 GB.
Every figure above is a row in the tables below, and each row links out to the review or public benchmark database the number was taken from; the SpecPicks median is computed here from the runs it names, each a row in the AI table. SpecPicks aggregates published measurements; it does not report first-party benchmark runs.
eBay listing (Used): $27,500.00, checked . eBay listings are third-party and can end at any time; as an eBay Partner Network member, SpecPicks may earn a commission.
Read the full comparison → AMD Instinct MI300X vs Consumer GPUs: What Local AI Builders Should Buy in 2026
Check what fits in 192 GB: by file size at each listed quantization, 27 of the 27 open-weight model files in the SpecPicks Will-It-Run matrix load entirely into the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB's 192 GB while keeping at least 1.5 GB reserved for an ~8K context; the largest, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B (a 42.5 GB Q4_K_M file per its Hugging Face listing), leaves roughly 149.5 GB free. Check a model in the Will-It-Run matrix →
What fits in the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB's 192 GB, and what doesn't
7 of these 7 model files load whole into 192 GB with room for an ~8K context. A file fits when the card keeps at least 1.5 GB free after the weights; file sizes are the GGUF downloads on Hugging Face. Speeds are this card's single-user generation speed from cited community runs at the Q4-class file listed; a row with no cited run says so rather than estimating one.
| Model | Quant | Fits in 192 GB? | Cited speed on this card |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B 4.9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~187.1 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 14B 9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~183 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| gpt-oss-20b 21B-A3.6B · 12.1 GB file | MXFP4 | Fits~179.9 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B 18.6 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~173.4 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 32B 19.8 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~172.2 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Gemma 3 27B 28.7 GB file | Q8_0 | Fits~163.3 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Llama 3.3 70B 42.5 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~149.5 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
The AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB is a datacenter accelerator from the CDNA 3 family released in 2023 from AMD. Key on-paper specs include 192 GB of HBM3 memory, 5300 GB/s of memory bandwidth, 750W TDP. It launched with a $15,000 MSRP, though street prices typically diverge meaningfully from launch pricing. Data on this page draws on 3 synthetic benchmark results, 14 community AI inference reports (top 12 shown), compiled from llama.cpp GitHub, AMD ROCm Blog, KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard, Geekbench Browser, Medium, NextPlatform, Valohai; each table row links to its source. Read this page when shopping the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB, comparing it against other datacenter accelerators for your server or cluster, or sizing it for a specific workload (LLM inference and serving, fine-tuning, or HPC compute).
AI Inference Performance
Tokens per second under each model + quantization. Higher = faster generation. Bars compare runs across the same model.
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 232.9 tok/s | — | KnightLi GPU Benchmark Scoreboard 2026-04-23 | |
| deepseek-r1:8b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 161.5 tok/s | 4.7 GB | llama.cpp GitHub Discussions 2025-07-12 | |
| qwen3:8b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 161.5 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub 2025-07-12 | |
| llama3.1:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 36.5 tok/s | — | AMD ROCm Blog 2025-10 | |
| llama3:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 36.3 tok/s | 42.5 GB | llama.cpp GitHub (Discussion #14640) 2025-07-12 | |
| llama3.1:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 36.3 tok/s | 39.6 GB | llama.cpp GitHub (Discussion #14640) 2025-07-12 | |
| deepseek-r1-distill-llama:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 36.3 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub 2025-07-12 | |
| deepseek-r1:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 36.3 tok/s | 39.6 GB | llama.cpp GitHub Discussions 2025-07-12 |
Batched serving throughput
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec (aggregate) | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen1.5-moe:2.7b-a2.7b | FP16 vllm batched | 2896.9 tok/s aggregate | — | Valohai 2024-10-31 | |
| llama2:70b | FP8 other batched | 2530.7 tok/s aggregate | — | NextPlatform (MLPerf Inference v4.1) 2024-09-03 | |
| qwen3:8b | — vllm batched | 1142.1 tok/s aggregate | — | AMD ROCm Blog 2025-07-24 | |
| llama3.1:70b | FP8 vllm batched | 1131.3 tok/s aggregate | — | Medium (Sam Stoelinga) 2024-11 |
Synthetic Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bars are scaled within each benchmark family (multi-thread, single-thread, etc.) so you can compare like-with-like at a glance.
| Benchmark | Relative | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 379,660 points | Geekbench Browser retrieved 2026-07-09Same result reported by Tom's Hardware | |
| MLPerf Inference v4.1 — Llama-3.1-405B Server (8x MI300X) | 24,110 tokens/s | AMD ROCm Blog / MLPerf 2025-01-15 | |
| MLPerf Inference v4.1 — Llama-2-70B Server (8x MI300X) | 22,021 tokens/s | AMD ROCm Blog / MLPerf 2025-01-15 |
Full Specifications
| TDP | 750 W |
|---|---|
| VRAM | 192 GB |
| Process | 5 nm |
| Bf16 tflops | 1307 |
| Fp16 tflops | 1307 |
| Memory type | HBM3 |
| Compute units | 304 |
| Shading units | 19456 |
| Memory bandwidth | 5300 GB/s |
AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB — Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB best used for?
When was the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB released, and what was its launch MSRP?
Where do the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB benchmark numbers come from?
Can the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB run local LLMs?
Where can I buy the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB?
Buying guides that rank the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB's class
This page is the raw performance data. The guides below turn it into a ranked pick for a specific build.
Editorial guides covering the AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB
In-depth SpecPicks reviews, build guides, and head-to-heads referencing this datacenter accelerator.
- Is My CPU Sufficient for Light Universe Simulations?
- Grok 4.3 vs GPT-5 vs Claude 4.7: Local Hardware Implications of the Closed-Model Intelligence Index
- RTX 3060 12GB Local LLM: Reddit Consensus on What Runs (2026)
- RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX 5090 for Local 70B LLMs: 96GB vs 32GB
- Tesla P40 vs RTX 3090: Used 24GB GPUs for Local LLMs in 2026
- Used RTX 3090 vs New GPU for Local LLMs: 2026 Reddit Consensus
- gpt-oss on a 12GB GPU: 2026 Community Consensus (RTX 3060)
- Best GPU for Local LLMs by VRAM: 2026 Reddit Consensus
- Browse all SpecPicks reviews →
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 Parts List
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- ZOTAC RTX 3060 12GB vs Intel Arc B580 12GB for 1440p Gaming in 2026
- How We Use a Vision-LLM to Install Sound Blaster and Voodoo Drivers on Windows 98 — A Real Workflow From Our…
- Local AI Server LLM Setups 2025: What Hardware Matters
- How to run Llama 3.1 8B on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
- Best Game Streaming Starter Kit in 2026: Mic, Light, and Capture
- HyperX QuadCast 2 vs Blue Yeti: Best USB Mic for Game Streaming in 2026
- Best PC Gaming Controllers in 2026: 5 Top Picks
- Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X for 1440p Gaming in 2026
- Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 7 5700X for a Budget Homelab and Virtualization Box in 2026
- GameSir G7 SE vs 8BitDo Pro 2 vs DualSense for PC
- Local LLMs on the Ryzen 5 5600G: llama.cpp CPU Inference Numbers
- Best Retro Gaming Console to Buy in 2026
- Is the RTX 3060 12GB Still the Best Budget GPU for 1080p Esports in 2026?
- Raspberry Pi AI Module in 2026: Can a Pi + Hailo Run Local LLMs?
- GeForce 4 Ti 4600 Won't Boot Past POST: AGP Voltage and BIOS Field Guide
- Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 7 5800X for a 24/7 Ollama Box
- SATA vs NVMe for a Ryzen 5800X Gaming Build: Does It Matter?
- Athlon 64 + Radeon 9800 Pro Windows XP Build (2026 Revival): CompactFlash-to-IDE Boot Guide
- Best GPU for Qwen 3 32B (2026)
- Jetson Orin Nano Super vs Hailo-8 AI HAT+: Which Edge-AI Path Is Right for You?
- Building a MAME Fighting Setup: Fight Stick + CF Storage for an Arcade Corner
- Logitech Extreme 3D Pro vs DualSense for Flight and Space Sims in 2026
- ViewSonic VX2730D-4K Review: 4K Gaming at 163 PPI and 144Hz
- Best SSD for Steam Deck and Handheld PCs in 2026
More buying guides from SpecPicks
Browse all buying guides →- Best NVMe SSDs for Gaming in 2026
- Best Controllers for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best GPU for Running 27B-32B Local LLMs in 2026
- Best 4K Monitors for Content Creators in 2026
- Best 1440p 240Hz Gaming Monitors in 2026
- Best Gaming Monitors for 2026
- Best External SSDs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best GPUs for Running Local LLMs in 2026
- Best Tools for Building and Repairing Retro PCs in 2026
- Best GPUs for 4K Gaming in 2026
- Best AM5 Motherboards for 2026
- Best Mechanical Keyboards for Gaming in 2026
- Best Gaming Mice for 2026
- Best CPUs for Gaming in 2026
- Best CPUs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best Retro Gaming Consoles & Handhelds for 2026
- Best NVMe External Enclosures for 2026
- Best PC Cases for Building in 2026
- Best DDR5 RAM for Gaming PCs in 2026
- Best CPU Coolers for 2026
- Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2026
Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks
All benchmarks →- NVIDIA L40S 48GB — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 5 3600X — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA Tesla P40 24GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 7 7445HS — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600H — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 5700 XT — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6600S — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535H — benchmarks & specs
- GRID RTX6000P-6Q — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M3 Max 16 Core — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640S — benchmarks & specs
- Ryzen 7 9850X3D — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Arc A750 — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600U — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6600 LE — benchmarks & specs