Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — Specs & Performance Compared

Verdict: The Quadro RTX 4000 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on all 2 shared benchmarks on file, by 88% to 158%, including 88% in 3DMark Time Spy (14,340 vs 7,640). On llama3.1:8b, the Quadro RTX 4000 generates 53.5 tokens/s (per LocalScore.ai) against 7.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (per DatabaseMart), best community run on file for each.

Side-by-side GPU comparison of the Quadro RTX 4000 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. Released 2018 (Quadro RTX 4000), 2019 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060). Specs, synthetic benchmarks, AI inference tok/s, and Amazon availability below; each column header links to that part's benchmark page.

NVIDIA · Turing

Quadro RTX 4000

8 GB VRAM160W TDP2018

Full Quadro RTX 4000 benchmarks →

NVIDIA · Turing

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

6 GB VRAM160W TDP$349 MSRP2019

Full NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 benchmarks →

*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Price and availability subject to change.

Where to buy

A listing for each part; the current price and stock are on the retailer's page.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Quadro RTX 4000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
vram gb	8	6
vram type	—	GDDR6
tdp w	160	160
cuda cores	2304	1920
process nm	—	12

Synthetic benchmarks

Each row says whether a higher or a lower number is better (ranks and times are lower-is-better). Scores come from 3DMark, Notebookcheck, PCGamesN, HardwareCooking, GPU-Monkey, TopCPU, CpuTronic, PCBench, Legit Reviews and Geekbench Browser; each row links its sources, and where they differ the cell shows their median. Empty cells mean we don't yet have that benchmark on file for the SKU.

Benchmark	Quadro RTX 4000	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
3DMark Fire Strike (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, Notebookcheck	—	16,961 points
3DMark Port Royal (higher is better) Source: PCGamesN, HardwareCooking, GPU-Monkey	—	4,179 points
3DMark Speed Way (higher is better) Source: 3DMark, TopCPU	3,666 points	1,423 points
3DMark Speed Way Graphics (higher is better) Source: GPU-Monkey	—	1,453 points
3DMark Steel Nomad (higher is better) Source: CpuTronic	—	1,766 points
3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (Graphics score) (higher is better) Source: 3DMark	1,847 points	—
3DMark Time Spy (higher is better) Source: TopCPU, 3DMark, PCBench, Notebookcheck, Legit Reviews	14,340 points	7,640 points
3DMark Time Spy Extreme (higher is better) Source: TopCPU	6,708 points	—
3DMark Time Spy Extreme Graphics (higher is better) Source: GPU-Monkey	—	3,433 points
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (higher is better) Source: GPU-Monkey	—	7,482 points
Blender GPU Cycles (higher is better) Source: CpuTronic	5,293 points	—
Geekbench 5 OpenCL (higher is better) Source: Geekbench Browser	144,947 points	—

AI inference (tokens/sec)

Top community-reported tokens-per-second results for popular LLMs whose weights fit the card's memory, each linked to its source. See the per-SKU benchmark page for the full set including quantization and prompt length.

Quadro RTX 4000

llama3.2:1b: 189.0 tok/s (LocalScore.ai)
llama2:7b: 65.6 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub (CUDA performance scoreboard))
llama2:7b: 61.8 tok/s (llama.cpp GitHub Discussions #15013)

All Quadro RTX 4000 AI benchmarks →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

llama3.2:3b: 50.4 tok/s (DatabaseMart)
mistral:7b: 48.6 tok/s (DatabaseMart)
deepseek-r1:1.5b: 43.1 tok/s (DatabaseMart)

All NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 AI benchmarks →

Quick answers

Which is faster, the Quadro RTX 4000 or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060?

The Quadro RTX 4000 is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on all 2 shared benchmarks on file, by 88% to 158%, including 88% in 3DMark Time Spy (14,340 vs 7,640).

Which is better for running local LLMs?

On llama3.1:8b, the Quadro RTX 4000 generates 53.5 tokens/s (per LocalScore.ai) against 7.4 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (per DatabaseMart), best community run on file for each.