Skip to main content
Intel Arc A380E
Intel · GPU · Alchemist

Intel Arc A380E — Benchmarks & Specs

Short answer: the Intel Arc A380E generates 18.7 tokens/sec on llama3.1:8b (q4_K_M) under ipex-llm in a single cited run, per Robert's Blog; there are too few comparable runs on file for a median.

Bottom line: how fast is the Intel Arc A380E?

At 1080p Low with XeSS upscaling, the Intel Arc A380E averages 120 fps in Cyberpunk 2077, per GameGPU. For local LLM inference it generates 18.7 tokens/sec running llama3.1:8b at q4_K_M under ipex-llm, per Robert's Blog. In 3DMark Fire Strike it scores 9,728 points, per Notebookcheck.

Every figure above is a row in the tables below, and each row links out to the review or public benchmark database the number was taken from. SpecPicks aggregates published measurements; it does not report first-party benchmark runs.

The Intel Arc A380E is a graphics card from the Alchemist family from Intel. Data on this page draws on 10 synthetic benchmark results, 5 community AI inference reports, 14 game frame-rate results, compiled from CpuTronic, Robert's Blog, TechSpot, GameGPU, Geeks3D, Notebookcheck, PassMark, Back2Gaming, technical.city; each table row links to its source. Read this page when shopping the Intel Arc A380E, comparing it against other graphics cards in your build, or sizing it for a specific workload (gaming at 1080p/1440p/4K, synthetic benchmark scores, or local LLM inference).

Gaming Performance (reported FPS)

Average and 1% low frame rates by game, resolution, and quality preset. Bars are scaled against the fastest result on this page.

Gaming frame rates for the Intel Arc A380E by game, resolution, and quality preset. Rows from aggregator sites are estimates, not measured runs, dated by when SpecPicks fetched them. “1% low” is the frame-time floor that determines perceived smoothness. Each row links to its original review or benchmark database.
Game Resolution Settings Relative Avg FPS 1% low Source
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Low XeSS 120 fps — GameGPU 2026-02-05
Forza Horizon 5 1080p High 65 fps — Back2Gaming 2022-07
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Low 60 fps — GameGPU 2026-02-05
Counter-Strike 2 1080p High 57 fps — technical.city 2026-06-12
Doom Eternal 1080p Ultra 56 fps — TechSpot 2022-09
Far Cry 6 1080p Ultra 52 fps — TechSpot 2022-09
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Medium 50 fps — CpuTronic 2026-06-12
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1080p Medium 48 fps — TechSpot 2022-09
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Medium 44 fps — TechSpot 2022-09
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p Ultra 42 fps — TechSpot 2022-09
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p Highest 41 fps — CpuTronic 2026-06-12
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Medium RT on 27 fps — CpuTronic 2026-06-12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p Highest 27 fps — CpuTronic 2026-06-12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4K Highest 10 fps — CpuTronic 2026-06-12

AI Inference Performance

Tokens per second under each model + quantization. Higher = faster generation. Bars compare runs across the same model.

Local LLM inference throughput on the Intel Arc A380E, in generated tokens per second for a single request (one user's generation speed). Higher is better; each row links to the community report or benchmark database it came from.
Model Quantization Relative Tokens/sec VRAM used Source
llama3.2:1b q4_K_M ollama 44.8 tok/s — Robert's Blog (machinezoo.com) 2026-03-29
llama3.2:3b q4_K_M ollama 25.0 tok/s — Robert's Blog (machinezoo.com) 2026-03-29
llama3.1:8b q4_K_M ollama 18.7 tok/s — Robert's Blog (machinezoo.com) 2026-03-29
qwen2.5:7b q4_K_M ollama 14.4 tok/s — Robert's Blog (machinezoo.com) 2026-03-29
qwen2.5-coder:7b q4_K_M ollama 14.4 tok/s — Robert's Blog (machinezoo.com) 2026-03-29

Synthetic Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bars are scaled within each benchmark family (multi-thread, single-thread, etc.) so you can compare like-with-like at a glance.

Synthetic benchmark scores for the Intel Arc A380E — higher is better. Each row links to the public database the number was taken from. A benchmark listed more than once is separate published results, shown as published rather than averaged.
Benchmark Relative Score Source
3DMark Fire Strike 9,728 points Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-07-12
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 9,402 points Geeks3D 2022-10-27
PassMark G3D Mark 6,290 pts PassMark retrieved 2026-04-20
3DMark Time Spy 4,457 points Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-07-12
3DMark Time Spyasrock arc a380 challenger itx 6gb oc review 4,334 points Geeks3D 2022-10-27
PassMark GPU Compute 2,898 points PassMark VideoCardBenchmark retrieved 2026-08-22
PassMark G2D Mark 835 pts PassMark retrieved 2026-04-20
3DMark Steel Nomad 789 points CpuTronic retrieved 2026-06-12
3DMark Port Royal 745 points Geeks3D 2022-10-27
3DMark Speed Way 620 points Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-06-12

Intel Arc A380E — Frequently Asked Questions

Where do the Intel Arc A380E benchmark numbers come from?
Each benchmark row on this page names its source (public benchmark databases such as TechPowerUp, PassMark, Geekbench and Cinebench, and community reports such as r/LocalLLaMA threads) and links to it, so every number can be checked against the original.
Can the Intel Arc A380E run local LLMs?
Yes — AI inference results for the Intel Arc A380E are on file; the AI Inference Performance section on this page lists model, quantization and tokens-per-second for each run.
Where can I buy the Intel Arc A380E?
No verified listing for this exact part is on file yet. The Compare tool and the /benchmarks index cover adjacent parts that are in stock.

Buying guides that rank the Intel Arc A380E's class

This page is the raw performance data. The guides below turn it into a ranked pick for a specific build.

Related GPUs

Editorial guides covering the Intel Arc A380E

In-depth SpecPicks reviews, build guides, and head-to-heads referencing this graphics card.

More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all articles & guides →

More reviews from the SpecPicks archive

Browse all reviews →

More buying guides from SpecPicks

Browse all buying guides →

Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks

All benchmarks →