DeepSeek V3.2 leads every published math + reasoning benchmark in the open-weight space, and its MoE architecture means inference cost is far below the 236B parameter count suggests. The 16B variant runs comfortably on a single 24 GB card and is the best math-tutor / coding-assistant tier model open.
Hardware tiers for running DeepSeek V3.2
🧪
Minimum (16B dense at Q4)
16 GB cards run the 16B-dense variant at Q4 cleanly. Avoid 8 GB cards — context window collapses.
VRAM16 GB
System RAM32 GB DDR5
Throughput~60 tok/s on 16B Q4 (RTX 4070 Ti Super 16 GB)
Why is DeepSeek's 236B model not slower than 70B Llama?
Mixture-of-experts (MoE). DeepSeek 236B routes each token through only ~21B active parameters; inference cost is roughly that of a 21B dense model. The 236B is the total expert pool.
What math problems can DeepSeek V3.2 actually solve?
AIME 2024-level competition math at near-human-expert accuracy on the 236B variant. The 16B dense variant handles up to AP Calc / IMO-easy with high reliability. Best math reasoning in the open-weight space.
DeepSeek vs Qwen3 for coding?
Qwen3 wins on real-world coding tasks (better tool-use, more idiomatic generations). DeepSeek wins when the task is more mathematical (algorithm design, complexity analysis). For full-stack dev: Qwen3. For algo / interview prep: DeepSeek.
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive