SAMSUNG 870 EVO 4TB 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-77E4T0B/AM) , Black
Bottom line: The SAMSUNG 870 EVO 4TB 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal SSD ($1,043.14 on Amazon as of 2026-10-30 16:17 UTC): Hits the SATA III ceiling at 560/530 MB/s sequential read/write; main trade-off: SATA III caps it far below any NVMe M.2 drive's throughput.
As an Amazon Associate, SpecPicks earns from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure →
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated 2026-10-30. Price and availability subject to change.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓ Hits the SATA III ceiling at 560/530 MB/s sequential read/write
- ✓ Up to 2,400 TBW endurance rating for years of daily writes
- ✓ Hardware encryption: AES 256, TCG/Opal v2.0, MS eDrive (IEEE1667)
- ✓ Tested against NAS units, motherboards, and video recorders
Cons
- ✗ SATA III caps it far below any NVMe M.2 drive's throughput
- ✗ 4TB tier carries a steep price premium over 1TB and 2TB
- ✗ 2.5-inch form factor needs a bay and two cables, not an M.2 slot
- ✗ No DRAM-free or PCIe upgrade path; the interface is the hard limit
Manufacturer description
THE SSD ALL-STAR: The latest 870 EVO has indisputable performance, reliability and compatibility built upon Samsung's pioneering technology.Computer Platform:PC.Environmental Specs - Shock : 1,500 G & 0.5 ms (Half sine). Performance - Encryption : Class 0 (AES 256) TCG/Opal v2.0, MS eDrive (IEEE1667). EXCELLENCE IN PERFORMANCE: Enjoy professional level SSD performance with 870 EVO, which maximizes the SATA interface limit to 560/530 MB/s sequential speeds, Accelerates write speeds and maintains long term high performance with a larger variable buffer INDUSTRY DEFINING RELIABILITY: Meet the…
SpecPicks Verdict
SpecPicks scored SAMSUNG 870 EVO 4TB 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal SSD using a rating × review-volume × price-fit model applied to published specs and reviews across the ssds & storage category. Samsung's ssds & storage lineup sits within the broader category mid-tier; price and specs are the deciding factors over brand loyalty here. Judge it on the specification table and the price rather than on sentiment: check the figures that decide your use case, then put it side-by-side with two or three close alternatives in the Compare tool before clicking through.
Common buyer scenarios for ssds & storage of this kind: matching it to an existing build, replacing a failing part, or upgrading from a previous-generation equivalent. Check the spec table below against your current setup — particularly socket / form-factor / power-rating fields — and confirm compatibility on the retailer's listing before purchase. Prices and stock are set by the retailer and may have moved since this page was last updated.
Frequently Asked Questions
How fast is the Samsung 870 EVO 4TB?
It reaches 560 MB/s sequential read and 530 MB/s sequential write, which is the practical limit of the SATA III interface. A larger variable write buffer helps it hold high speeds through long transfers instead of dropping off partway.
Will this SSD work in my NAS or laptop?
Samsung compatibility-tested the 870 EVO against major chipsets, motherboards, NAS units, and video recording devices. It uses the standard 2.5-inch SATA III form factor, so any bay and SATA data/power connection will accept it.
How long will a 4TB 870 EVO last before it wears out?
The 870 EVO line is rated for up to 2,400 TBW (terabytes written). At that rating you could write hundreds of gigabytes a day for years before approaching the endurance limit.
Does the 870 EVO support hardware encryption for BitLocker?
Yes. It supports Class 0 AES 256, TCG/Opal v2.0, and Microsoft eDrive (IEEE1667), so BitLocker can offload encryption to the drive controller instead of your CPU.
Should I buy this or an NVMe M.2 SSD instead?
Choose the 870 EVO when you need a 2.5-inch SATA drive: older desktops, laptops without M.2 slots, NAS bays, or video recorders. If your board has a free M.2 slot and you want maximum throughput, an NVMe drive will be several times faster.
How much shock can this drive take?
It is rated to 1,500 G at 0.5 ms half-sine. Check the product listing for current warranty terms.
Key Features
- THE SSD ALL-STAR: The latest 870 EVO has indisputable performance, reliability and compatibility built upon Samsung's pioneering technology.Computer Platform:PC.Environmental Specs - Shock : 1,500 G & 0.5 ms (Half sine). Performance - Encryption : Class 0 (AES 256) TCG/Opal v2.0, MS eDrive (IEEE1667).
- EXCELLENCE IN PERFORMANCE: Enjoy professional level SSD performance with 870 EVO, which maximizes the SATA interface limit to 560/530 MB/s sequential speeds, Accelerates write speeds and maintains long term high performance with a larger variable buffer
- INDUSTRY DEFINING RELIABILITY: Meet the demands of every task from everyday computing to 8K video processing, with up to 2,400 TBW.
- MORE COMPATIBLE THAN EVER: 870 EVO has been compatibility tested for major host systems and applications, including chipsets, motherboards, NAS, and video recording devices
Full Specifications
| Size | 4TB |
|---|---|
| Brand | Samsung |
| Color | Black |
| Model | MZ-77E4T0B/AM |
| Warranty | 3 Years Manufacturer |
| UnitCount | 1 |
| ReleaseDate | 2021-01-19T00:00:01Z |
| Manufacturer | Samsung |
| ItemPartNumber | MZ-77E4T0B/AM |
Hardware benchmark data
Ready to buy?
SAMSUNG 870 EVO 4TB 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-77E4T0B/AM) , Black is listed on Amazon. Price, availability, shipping and returns are set by Amazon and its sellers — check the listing for current terms. SpecPicks earns a small commission on qualifying purchases — thank you for supporting independent review work.
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated 2026-10-30. Price and availability subject to change.
Read our analysis
SpecPicks coverage that features this SSDs & Storage.
Related SSDs & Storage
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 Parts List
- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- Sound Blaster Audigy FX Deep Dive: Is It Worth It for a 2003 WinXP Period-Correct Gaming Build?
- Mystery N64 Cartridge Found in the Woods Boots Up
- Best 4K Monitor for PS5 in 2026 (Without Overpaying)
- Apple Sues OpenAI Over Alleged Trade-Secret Theft: What It Means
- Plug-and-Play Retro Consoles Compared: Genesis Mini vs SNES vs NES Classic
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B on Local Hardware: MLX 4-bit at ~70GB Explained
- Imaging a 1998 IDE Drive and Letting an LLM Rebuild Win98
- Best Budget AMD Gaming PC Upgrades in 2026: 5 Parts That Move the Needle
- LG UltraGear 52G930B 52-inch 5K gaming monitor review: Extreme in every respect
- Best Steam Deck Accessories in 2026: Docks, Audio, Controllers, and Storage
- Build a Plex Media Server on a Raspberry Pi 4 8GB in 2026
- Sound Blaster on a Retro Gaming PC: Period-Correct Audio and the Modern G6 Bridge
- Samsung's 256GB microSD Falls to $47.99 — Plus the SSD Sidegrade
- Open-Source NVK Adds DLSS: What RTX 3060 Owners Get
- Muse Spark 1.1 Beats GLM-5.2 at Coding — Does It Change the Local-Rig Question?
- ComfyUI on an RTX 3060 12GB: Real Image-Gen Throughput in 2026
- ROCm in 2026: Is AMD Finally a Real Local-LLM Option?
- SteamOS Boots on Intel: Enthusiast Hack Breaks Valve's AMD-Only Grip
- SATA vs NVMe for a Ryzen 5800X Gaming Build: Does It Matter?
- Run Qwen 3.6 27B Locally: VRAM, Quant & tok/s on a 12GB RTX 3060
- LoRA Fine-Tuning Small LLMs on an RTX 3060 12GB in 2026
- Best AMD CPU for Gaming in 2026: Our Top 5 Ryzen Picks
- Turtle Beach Recon 50 vs BERIBES: Best Budget Gaming Headset Under $40?
- Best Capture Setup for Console Streaming in 2026: Elgato Cam Link 4K + PS4 Pro
Earliest SpecPicks reviews
Browse full archive →- Best GPU for Llama 3.1 8B (2026)
- Best GPU for Qwen 3 14B (2026)
- Best GPU for Qwen 3 32B (2026)
- Best GPU for Llama 3.1 70B (2026)
- Best GPU for DeepSeek-R1 32B (2026)
- Best GPU for Llama 3.1 405B (2026)
- How to run Llama 3.1 8B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
- How to run Qwen 3 14B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
- How to run Qwen 3 32B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
- How to run Llama 3.1 70B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
- How to run DeepSeek-R1 32B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
- How to run Llama 3.1 8B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090