NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB — Benchmarks & Specs
Short answer: the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB generates a median 102 tokens/sec on 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 3 cited runs from llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15013, GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference and OpenLLMBenchmarks. Its 48 GB of VRAM holds up to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context, by the Will-It-Run matrix's sizing (27 of 27 models fit). A used eBay listing for it is $4,349.00, checked (listings can end at any time).
- Median speed 102 tok/s 3 cited runs, 7-9B at Q4, llama.cpp
- Fits in 48 GB up to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M → at ~8K context; 27 of 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix
Who should buy this instead: the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB's 48 GB puts it in the 48 GB+ tier of the local-LLM GPU picks by VRAM (one card per tier, each with cited tok/s). If the models you run fit in 24 GB, compare the 24 GB pick. If they need more than 48 GB, start at the 128 GB unified pick.
NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB: verdict by use case
- For everyday local models (7-9B dense): a median 102 tok/s at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 3 cited runs (llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15013, GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference).
- For 70B-class local models (65-73B dense): a median 14.6 tok/s at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp, across 4 cited runs (OpenLLMBenchmarks, GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference).
- For the largest model in 48 GB: DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M with an ~8K context; 27 of the 27 models in the Will-It-Run matrix fit.
Each verdict quotes a figure from a linked source or a row in the tables below. Where no cited figure exists for a use case, there is no verdict line for it.
Bottom line: how fast is the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB?
SpecPicks median: 102 tokens/sec across 3 cited single-user runs of 7-9B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp (range 102–145 tok/s), from llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15013, GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference, OpenLLMBenchmarks. For larger models, the SpecPicks median is 14.6 tokens/sec across 4 cited single-user runs of 65-73B dense models at 4-bit (Q4) under llama.cpp (range 14.1–14.6 tok/s), from OpenLLMBenchmarks (2 runs), GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference, LocalScore. For local LLM inference it generates 14.5 tokens/sec running qwen2.5:72b at q4_K_M under ollama, per DatabaseMart. In 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics it scores 27,511 points, per technical.city. Its 48 GB of VRAM is the binding constraint for local inference: the largest models on file at 4-bit quantization on this card are 72B-class: the qwen2.5:72b run above and qwen:72b (q4_0), which generates 14.5 tokens/sec under ollama, per DatabaseMart. That run's source does not report a context length; the Will-It-Run matrix sizes each model at its listed quantization with an ~8K context, and by that measure DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B at Q4_K_M is the largest that fits in 48 GB.
Every figure above is a row in the tables below, and each row links out to the review or public benchmark database the number was taken from; the SpecPicks median is computed here from the runs it names, each a row in the AI table. SpecPicks aggregates published measurements; it does not report first-party benchmark runs.
eBay listing (Used): $4,349.00, checked . eBay listings are third-party and can end at any time; as an eBay Partner Network member, SpecPicks may earn a commission.
Read the full comparison → Radeon Pro W7900 48GB vs RTX A6000 48GB for Local 70B Inference (2026)
Check what fits in 48 GB: by file size at each listed quantization, 27 of the 27 open-weight model files in the SpecPicks Will-It-Run matrix load entirely into the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB's 48 GB while keeping at least 1.5 GB reserved for an ~8K context; the largest, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B (a 42.5 GB Q4_K_M file per its Hugging Face listing), leaves roughly 5.5 GB free. Will DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama 70B run on the RTX A6000 48GB? → · Full Will-It-Run matrix
What fits in the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB's 48 GB, and what doesn't
7 of these 7 model files load whole into 48 GB with room for an ~8K context. A file fits when the card keeps at least 1.5 GB free after the weights; file sizes are the GGUF downloads on Hugging Face. Speeds are this card's single-user generation speed from cited community runs at the Q4-class file listed; a row with no cited run says so rather than estimating one.
| Model | Quant | Fits in 48 GB? | Cited speed on this card |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B 4.9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~43.1 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 14B 9 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~39 GB left for context | 40.7 tok/s1 cited run, llama.cpp, per hardware-corner.net |
| gpt-oss-20b 21B-A3.6B · 12.1 GB file | MXFP4 | Fits~35.9 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B 18.6 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~29.4 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Qwen3 32B 19.8 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~28.2 GB left for context | 27.5 tok/smedian of 3 cited runs, per DatabaseMart, LocalScore (Mozilla Builders), hardware-corner.net |
| Gemma 3 27B 28.7 GB file | Q8_0 | Fits~19.3 GB left for context | No public measurement on file |
| Llama 3.3 70B 42.5 GB file | Q4_K_M | Fits~5.5 GB left for context | 13.6 tok/s1 cited run, ollama, per DatabaseMart (Ollama GPU benchmark) |
The NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB is a graphics card from the Ampere Pro family released in 2020 from NVIDIA. Key on-paper specs include 48 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, 300W TDP. It launched with a $4,650 MSRP, though street prices typically diverge meaningfully from launch pricing. Data on this page draws on 27 synthetic benchmark results (top 10 shown), 35 community AI inference reports (top 17 shown), compiled from DatabaseMart, OpenLLMBenchmarks, GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference, llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15013, LocalScore, StorageReview, 3DMark, CpuTronic, llama.cpp GitHub, Notebookcheck, PassMark, technical.city, TopCPU.net; each table row links to its source. Read this page when shopping the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB, comparing it against other graphics cards in your build, or sizing it for a specific workload (synthetic benchmark scores or local LLM inference).
AI Inference Performance
Tokens per second under each model + quantization. Higher = faster generation. Bars compare runs across the same model.
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llama2:7b | q4_0 llama.cpp | 144.9 tok/s | — | llama.cpp GitHub Discussion #15013 2025-08 | |
| llama3:8b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 102.2 tok/s | — | GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference (GitHub, XiongjieDai) 2024-05 | |
| llama3:8b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 102.2 tok/s | — | OpenLLMBenchmarks 2024-09-30 | |
| llama2:13b | — ollama | 63.6 tok/s | 7.4 GB | DatabaseMart 2025-03 | |
| phi4:14b | q4_K_M ollama | 52.6 tok/s | — | DatabaseMart (Ollama GPU benchmark) 2024-12-17 | |
| Mixtral 8x7B | Q4_K_M llama.cpp | 52.0 tok/s | 27.8 GB | llama.cpp GitHub 2025-11-20 | |
| qwen2.5:14b | q4_K_M ollama | 50.3 tok/s | — | DatabaseMart (Ollama GPU benchmark) 2024-12-17 | |
| deepseek-r1:14b | q4_0 ollama | 48.4 tok/s | — | DatabaseMart 2025-02 | |
| Llama 3.1 70B | Q4_K_M llama.cpp | 14.6 tok/s | 42.5 GB | OpenLLMBenchmarks 2025-12 | |
| llama3:70b | q4_K_M llama.cpp | 14.6 tok/s | — | GPU-Benchmarks-on-LLM-Inference (GitHub, XiongjieDai) 2024-05 | |
| qwen2.5:72b | q4_K_M ollama | 14.5 tok/s | 43.7 GB | DatabaseMart 2026-08-25 | |
| qwen:72b | q4_K_M ollama | 14.5 tok/s | — | DatabaseMart (Ollama GPU benchmark) 2024-12-17 | |
| DeepSeek-R1 70B Distill | Q4_K_M llama.cpp | 14.1 tok/s | 43.2 GB | LocalScore (Mozilla Builders) retrieved 2026-05-06 |
Batched serving throughput
| Model | Quantization | Relative | Tokens/sec (aggregate) | VRAM used | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deepseek-r1-distill-llama:8b | BF16 vllm 50 concurrent requests | 1643.9 tok/s aggregate | 15.0 GB | DatabaseMart 2026-08-25 | |
| deepseek-r1-distill-llama:8b | FP16 vllm 50 concurrent requests | 1385.8 tok/s aggregate | 15.0 GB | DatabaseMart 2025-03 | |
| llama3.1:8b | FP16 vllm 50 concurrent requests | 1218.6 tok/s aggregate | 15.0 GB | DatabaseMart 2025-03 | |
| qwen2.5:14b | FP16 vllm 50 concurrent requests | 695.5 tok/s aggregate | 28.0 GB | DatabaseMart 2025-03 |
Synthetic Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bars are scaled within each benchmark family (multi-thread, single-thread, etc.) so you can compare like-with-like at a glance.
| Benchmark | Relative | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics | 27,511 points | technical.city retrieved 2026-05-01Same result reported by Notebookcheck | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 25,280 points | Notebookcheck retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 24,800 | PassMark 2026-05-06 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 22,767 points | PassMark Software retrieved 2026-05-01 | |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 22,657 points | PassMark PerformanceTest retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 22,185 points | StorageReview 2023-10-19 | |
| 3DMark Time Spynvidia rtx 6000 ada vs rtx a6000 review | 18,451 points | StorageReview 2023-10-19 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 18,152 points | CpuTronic retrieved 2026-06-09 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 17,796 points | 3DMark 2022-01 | |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 17,742 points | TopCPU.net retrieved 2026-05-01 |
Full Specifications
| TDP | 300 W |
|---|---|
| VRAM | 48 GB |
| CUDA cores | 10752 |
| Memory type | GDDR6 |
NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB — Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB best used for?
When was the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB released, and what was its launch MSRP?
Where do the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB benchmark numbers come from?
Can the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB run local LLMs?
Where can I buy the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB?
Buying guides that rank the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB's class
This page is the raw performance data. The guides below turn it into a ranked pick for a specific build.
Editorial guides covering the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB
In-depth SpecPicks reviews, build guides, and head-to-heads referencing this graphics card.
- RTX A6000 48GB vs RTX 3090 24GB for Production LLM Inference (2026)
- Radeon Pro W7900 48GB vs RTX A6000 48GB for Local 70B Inference (2026)
- Inside reusable-agents: A Self-Hostable LLM Agent Framework Driving Two Live Consumer Sites in 2026
- NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB Review: The Workstation Card That Still Owns Local 70B Inference (2026)
- RTX 5090 vs RTX A6000 for Local LLMs: Speed (5090) or Capacity (A6000)?
- NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs RTX A6000: Is 96 GB Worth $4,000 More?
- Used RTX 3090 vs New GPU for Local LLMs: 2026 Reddit Consensus
- RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX 5090 for Local 70B LLMs: 96GB vs 32GB
- Browse all SpecPicks reviews →
More guides & deep dives from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all articles & guides →- The Complete Voodoo5 5500 AGP Driver Guide (2026 Edition)
- Best Retro Handhelds in 2026 — From $35 to $500
- How to Build a Windows 98 Retro PC in 2026
- Emulation Hardware in 2026: FPGA, Software, and Cart-Reader Ecosystems
- Best Budget Gaming PC Build 2026 — ~$1,000 Parts List
- Best 1440p Gaming GPUs in 2026
- RTX 4070 Super vs RX 7800 XT — Which to Buy in 2026
More reviews from the SpecPicks archive
Browse all reviews →- Asus ProArt PA27USD OLED Lands — and What 4K Gamers Can Buy for Less
- Best Raspberry Pi for Local LLMs & Home Lab in 2026: Pi 4 8GB vs Pi Zero
- Claude Opus 4.8 Ships, Tops GPT-5.5 on Intelligence Index
- hipEngine on Strix Halo + 7900 XTX: Native Qwen 3.6 Inference Without ROCm Drama
- CompactFlash as an IDE Hard Drive: Silent, Solid-State Storage for Win98 & DOS Builds
- NVK Open-Source Vulkan Driver Gains Experimental DLSS on Linux
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus vs Ryzen 5 7600X3D: The Mid-Range Faceoff
- CompactFlash to IDE: Period-Correct Silent Storage for Win98 Builds
- Building a Local AI-Agent Eval Rig After AISI's Benchmark Warning
- Ryzen 7 5800X + RTX 5060 Bundle Drops to $439 With a Free CPU Cooler
- AIO vs Air on a Ryzen 7 5800X: Corsair ML240L vs Noctua NH-U12S
- Building a Period-Correct 1999 3dfx Voodoo3 Windows 98 PC in 2026
- AMD Ryzen AI Max 395 Box: Can a 128GB Unified-Memory APU Replace a Dual-3090 Local LLM Rig?
- RTX 5080 vs RX 7900 XTX: Which GPU Wins in 2026?
- Logitech G502 Hero vs HyperX QuadCast 2 S vs Elgato Cam Link 4K: Building a Sub-$300 Streaming Starter Kit
- FIDECO vs Unitek vs Vantec: Best IDE-to-USB Adapter for Dumping Retro Drives
- Best GPU for 1440p Gaming Under $300 in 2026
- Intel Core Ultra X7 Panther Lake Performance on Linux 7.1
- Best Microphones for Streaming and Podcasting (2026)
- Glide on Modern PCs: dgVoodoo2 + nGlide for 3dfx-Era Games (2026)
- Qwen 3.6 35B on RTX 3060 12GB: 18–28 tok/s
- Qwen3 4B on Raspberry Pi 4 8GB vs Ryzen 5 5600G: Which Cheap Always-On Box Wins?
- Strix Halo Clustering for Local LLMs: What the LocalLLaMA Reports Show
- FIDECO vs Unitek vs Vantec: Which SATA/IDE Adapter Boots Win98 from CompactFlash in 2026?
More buying guides from SpecPicks
Browse all buying guides →- Best CPU Coolers for 2026
- Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2026
- Best GPU for Running 27B-32B Local LLMs in 2026
- Best Gaming Mice for 2026
- Best 1440p 240Hz Gaming Monitors in 2026
- Best CPUs for Gaming in 2026
- Best Retro Gaming Consoles & Handhelds for 2026
- Best DDR5 RAM for Gaming PCs in 2026
- Best Controllers for PC Gaming in 2026
- Best Tools for Building and Repairing Retro PCs in 2026
- Best AM5 Motherboards for 2026
- Best NVMe External Enclosures for 2026
- Best CPUs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best NVMe SSDs for Gaming in 2026
- Best GPUs for Running Local LLMs in 2026
- Best PC Cases for Building in 2026
- Best 4K Monitors for Content Creators in 2026
- Best External SSDs for Content Creators in 2026
- Best Mechanical Keyboards for Gaming in 2026
- Best Gaming Monitors for 2026
- Best GPUs for 4K Gaming in 2026
Hardware benchmark data on SpecPicks
All benchmarks →- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U — benchmarks & specs
- GeForce RTX 4090 D — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Core i9-14900K — benchmarks & specs
- RTX 6000D — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 7900 GRE — benchmarks & specs
- Radeon RX 6600 — benchmarks & specs
- Intel Core i5-14500 — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M4 Pro 12 Core — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M1 Pro 10 Core 3200 MHz — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA RTX Spark (N1X) 20-Core — benchmarks & specs
- NVIDIA RTX A4500 20GB — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M2 Pro 10 Core 3480 MHz — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900 — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M1 Pro 8 Core 3200 MHz — benchmarks & specs
- Apple M4 Pro 14 Core — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — benchmarks & specs
- GRID RTX6000P-4Q — benchmarks & specs
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — benchmarks & specs